Live data from Hacker News

Gear Acquisition Syndrome

library.oapen.org

131–140 of 163 posts

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#131
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny because 30 years ago (1994) we used to say the same thing about stuff built in the 50s :)

Really? Photography changed a lot from 1950 to 2000. I'd be very surprised if anyone would've preferred the 1950 grayscale and gigantic photography equipment over the 90s-2000 variants

You should see the garbage FD-mount stuff I had when I was a starving teenager. Hell, the camera's aperture arm only worked about 30% of the time.

The stuff from then that has survived til today is the survivorship bias.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#132
post #131
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? Photography changed a lot from 1950 to 2000. I'd be very surprised if anyone would've preferred the 1950 grayscale and gigantic photography equipment over the 90s-2000 variants

You should see the garbage FD-mount stuff I had when I was a starving teenager. Hell, the camera's aperture arm only worked about 30% of the time. The stuff from then that has survived til today is the survivorship bias.

Compared to other stuff of its time (Contax-Zeiss, Nikkor Ai-S, MD, even some M42 lenses), FD was indeed poor build quality, but it is still far, far superior to any of the trash in the more "modern" Canon EF line. Have you ever held a EF 50/1.4? It feels like a disposable toy. Back when I had one, it didn't even survive being tossed in a backpack for a city walk. Even a bunch of the EF "L" lenses are made of plastic.

Also, apertures in FD lenses are far easier to repair than EF lenses. They're just usually a lever or something that has slipped off its channel. In EF lenses it's often a fractured plastic part.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#133
post #2

It's a big problem for photographers too. Especially with the rapid progress of mirrorless cameras there is always the next camera or lens you need to get. I have bought lenses and never used them. I have also spent more time on looking for accessories for my 3D printer than actually using it. Not sure how to combat GAS. I feel for people with a full time job it somehow compensates for the lack of time working on one…

I'm still on my A7R2, it still works great, and while I sometimes wistfully think about the ultrasonic wiggly massive resolution mode (700Mpix or something) on the A7R4, I cannot in any way justify upgrading.

OTOH, I also bemoan the loss of my 70s OM1n 20 years ago.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#134
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My rule is that I start off with lower-mid-range equipment, until I know whether I actually like a hobby. If you love cycling and you do it all the time? By all means spend $3000 on a high-end, premium-brand, ultra-light-weight bike, if you've got the disposable income and buying it would bring you joy. But if you're just considering getting into cycling? There are perfectly good $500 bikes out there, and you don't n…

Are there really $500 bikes? New? What brand? I thought entry level was like 1k

There are in my country, sure. Brands like Pinnacle and Trek.

You're not going to be impressing anyone with an aluminium frame and Shimano's cheapest derailleur of course - but you also won't be scared to leave your bike chained up while you drop into a store.

And you might want to pick up lights, a lock, a helmet, and maybe mudguards, so you'll end up spending a bit more. And of course if you don't have the tools, time or inclination to do your own maintenance bike shops can get expensive.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#135
If you have the money and the gear makes you happy then by all means go for it. I'm not buying a Rolex to read the time either. For that i have my phone. Sometimes it's just nice to enjoy the expensive gear you have and play it occasionally and there is no ambition to master the instrument on a competitive level.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#136
post #43

I am a musician. Among most musicians I know know I am also one of those with the least obsession with gear. Gear is just that. Gear. Much of the sound in musical gear doesn't correlate with price. Sure when it comes to recording gear and studio equipment price tends to correlate with reliability, but we are living in truly magical times. I gifted my brother a 160 Euro Harley Benton (Thomann's budget brand for guitar…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnvYSKshvwc

There's at least a few guitar youtubers who played that "which electric guitar am I playing?" game. I think you can pretty easily make almost any sound from any electric guitar lol.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#137

Seems to me GAS is nuanced by the type of musical instrument acquired. The syndrome may be less severe with piano and harp players than it is with guitar, and electric bass players. Although, it may extend to excessive acquisitions of sheet music and books on musical theory. Single kit exceptions may include drummers and xylophone players. This syndrome is very evident in high-performance vehicle markets where there…

> The syndrome may be less severe with piano and harp players than it is with guitar, and electric bass players.

Have you ever seen Liberace's collection? Hehe. If you have enough money and space you can collect pianos as well.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#138
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny because 30 years ago (1994) we used to say the same thing about stuff built in the 50s :)

Really? Photography changed a lot from 1950 to 2000. I'd be very surprised if anyone would've preferred the 1950 grayscale and gigantic photography equipment over the 90s-2000 variants

Well, when it comes to lenses there is actually some old equipment that is still desirable. You can get lenses that are optically decent for very little money if you can live with manual focus or lack of modern coatings etc. I have several lenses from the 70s and 80s that I like a lot - though they’re a bit more work to use.

Then there’s lenses that provide interesting distortions or have interesting faults. Like old Soviet-era Helios lenses. In fact some old lens designs have been revived for modern cameras. Like the Petzval lenses (which I also own).

Good modern lenses are great. Optically fantastic, robust, easy to use etc. But that can be a bit … well, sterile and boring.

Which is why several of the vintage lenses I own have been used in movies. They make for a unique look. (There are companies that re-house lenses for use with modern movie cameras).

Note the scene with the emperor in the garden in the second Dune movie for instance.

There are lots of vintage lenses to lust after. And some of them can be quite expensive.

(Then there’s the whole medium format world. Where you can get digital backs and build cameras that cost more than your car)

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#139
post #129
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? Photography changed a lot from 1950 to 2000. I'd be very surprised if anyone would've preferred the 1950 grayscale and gigantic photography equipment over the 90s-2000 variants

There were a lot of amazing advancements from 1950 to 1980. After 1990 and autofocus the build quality of lenses started going downhill. The plastic focusing mechanisms negated a lot of the otherwise good optics. The affordable category of lenses today also don't gave good optics. While there are good modern optics used in higher-end lenses, it's easier to get better used old optics that outperforms shitty modern opt…

You said it better than me.

As for lack of autofocus, I’ve actually done action shots with a Petzval and various vintage manual focus lenses. Yes, it is tricky and you will miss a lot, but when you nail focus the result is glorious.

Re: Gear Acquisition Syndrome

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would get super expensive if you shoot things like airshows, birds in flight or sports where you can easily shoot 2000 images or more in one day. Or 4K video.

2000 images fits on about $3 worth of SD card, depending on resolution. Less than the time cost of going through and deciding which to delete.

I guess it depends on your equipment. 2000*50MB gets you up to 100GB. A decent 128GB card costs you from $20 up. A card that's capable of fast bursts can cost around $100.
Post reply on HN