Live data from Hacker News

Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

dusted.codes

71–80 of 121 posts

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#71

Microsoft still gets shat on for their 90s reputation, yet I rarely hear open source people complain about Google or Apple…

Google still distributes AOSP. The Android ecosystem is quite diverse and healthy. They've done a great job IMO

I wouldn't trust Apple with anything open source, but Apple's not trying to look like an open-source-friendly company. Microsoft is.

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#72
Microsoft is able to keep GitHub and npmjs.com online, despite all the DDoS attacks. It requires a huge amount of servers, bandwidth etc, to have all the repos, downloads, etc online. Having those online makes coding FOSS possible.

There are some FOSS alternatives to GitHub, but they have had more problems staying online.

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#74
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230315200925/http://antitrust.... What did changed since Microsoft used ACPI as tool against Linux? Enforced Auto-Updates, Ads, Cloud Account enforcement, Blocking Firefox partially in Teams [1], Setting Teams as Browser (Edge?), WSL (intent is not compatibility, it is to prevent migrations to Linux), Azure is a giant security problem and finally the deal with Qualcomm (hinder Linux on A…

"yOu cAn cHaNgE sEtTinGs" I watched my computer reinstall edge, reinstall/hijack my drives with onedrive, re-add ads... But I left Windows for Fedora. I felt offended that I didn't know about Fedora before. Like, there was some hatred toward Microsoft and Canonical for hiding a 10/10 OS. Angry at M$ for bribing schools. Angry at Canonical for free CD marketing that made crappy Debian-family the standard for 10+ years…

You've had a lot of issues with debian family compared to fedora?

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Relevant article: https://zedshaw.com/blog/2022-02-05-the-beggar-barons/

I'd originally told them "just follow the docs" because normally Microsoft's documentation is top notch, but this time I was dead wrong. MS' docs have been on a steady decline ever since they moved away from MSDN and went to an "open source" "community project" with them. For some of the newer stuff, a page without any spelling or grammar errors or unnaturally odd phrasing is exceedingly rare, and I have heard that t…

Apple’s docs also have gone downhill since the 90s. Does anybody still make good documentation?

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#76
post #72

Microsoft is able to keep GitHub and npmjs.com online, despite all the DDoS attacks. It requires a huge amount of servers, bandwidth etc, to have all the repos, downloads, etc online. Having those online makes coding FOSS possible. There are some FOSS alternatives to GitHub, but they have had more problems staying online.

FOSS existed and worked fine before Github and even before Git itself. It's certainly a convenient tool, but not irreplaceable. Git is also well suited to being used in a decentralized way (with no centrally hosted master) compared to older VCSs like SVN. Again, less convenient but not the end of the world.

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#79
post #72

Microsoft is able to keep GitHub and npmjs.com online, despite all the DDoS attacks. It requires a huge amount of servers, bandwidth etc, to have all the repos, downloads, etc online. Having those online makes coding FOSS possible. There are some FOSS alternatives to GitHub, but they have had more problems staying online.

I wouldn't count things they've acquired; those products/services were already running, and all they need to do it not add too much crap and/or keep the servers running.

Re: Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source? (2021)

#80
post #72

Microsoft is able to keep GitHub and npmjs.com online, despite all the DDoS attacks. It requires a huge amount of servers, bandwidth etc, to have all the repos, downloads, etc online. Having those online makes coding FOSS possible. There are some FOSS alternatives to GitHub, but they have had more problems staying online.

FOSS existed and worked fine before Github and even before Git itself. It's certainly a convenient tool, but not irreplaceable. Git is also well suited to being used in a decentralized way (with no centrally hosted master) compared to older VCSs like SVN. Again, less convenient but not the end of the world.

Git is not well suited since it lacks one of the most important part of collaboration - communication
Post reply on HN