Earlier quoted context omitted.
1989 was picked as it was the peak of the Japanese economy, the point from which people thought the economy could only continue to grow even larger, because that's what it'd always done - basically the same sort of stuff you're espousing here. But of course that's not what happened - anybody who invested at that time (or in many years around) would have seen nothing but losses over the decades to come. The end date w…
1989 until 2023 gives a 8.765% positive return with inflation.
Stocks trampled as Nikkei crashes 13%
101–107 of 107 posts
Re: Stocks trampled as Nikkei crashes 13%
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
1989 was picked as it was the peak of the Japanese economy, the point from which people thought the economy could only continue to grow even larger, because that's what it'd always done - basically the same sort of stuff you're espousing here. But of course that's not what happened - anybody who invested at that time (or in many years around) would have seen nothing but losses over the decades to come. The end date w…
1989 until 2023 gives a 8.765% positive return with inflation.
---
It’s a shame, as ETFs, and hell, index funds if you must, outperform savings on a 3 year or even less horizon.
Yes, my portfolio dropped 7% this month. I’m still up 6% YTD and 13% in the last 12 months.
My horizon is well over 5 years. It would be an easy way to slow or even reduce my net worth if I were to put it all in a savings account.
---
He's clearly still expecting reasonable returns on mid-range time frames, which is what people mean when suggesting the market always goes up - not an annualized 0.25%, let alone loss, for the next 40 years.
Re: Stocks trampled as Nikkei crashes 13%
#103It’s scary headlines like this: ‘trampled’, ‘crashes’, that put off less informed, risk averse individuals on lower incomes/ net worth, from investing in stocks. It’s a shame, as ETFs, and hell, index funds if you must, outperform savings on a 3 year or even less horizon. Yes, my portfolio dropped 7% this month. I’m still up 6% YTD and 13% in the last 12 months. My horizon is well over 5 years. It would be an easy wa…
Re: Stocks trampled as Nikkei crashes 13%
#104Re: Stocks trampled as Nikkei crashes 13%
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
So don't invest in 1989 and sell in 2013, any other time is more than fine. Did you deliberatly pick those dates? I think so. Here is the chart: https://www.nikkei.co.jp/nikkeiinfo/en/global_services/nikke... Let me pick the dates then: 2013 to 2023, annualized return inflation adjusted: 10%
1989 was picked as it was the peak of the Japanese economy, the point from which people thought the economy could only continue to grow even larger, because that's what it'd always done - basically the same sort of stuff you're espousing here. But of course that's not what happened - anybody who invested at that time (or in many years around) would have seen nothing but losses over the decades to come. The end date w…
Re: Stocks trampled as Nikkei crashes 13%
#106It’s scary headlines like this: ‘trampled’, ‘crashes’, that put off less informed, risk averse individuals on lower incomes/ net worth, from investing in stocks. It’s a shame, as ETFs, and hell, index funds if you must, outperform savings on a 3 year or even less horizon. Yes, my portfolio dropped 7% this month. I’m still up 6% YTD and 13% in the last 12 months. My horizon is well over 5 years. It would be an easy wa…