Live data from Hacker News

Foobar2000

foobar2000.org

171–180 of 193 posts

Re: Foobar2000

#171

It's kind of strange I have never seen any other player where you can just click on a folder and play music from it. Like two clicks, one on a folder (which loads the list of tracks) and second to start playing this list of course it's doable in any player but not with such ease

I was looking for a player that had this functionality when I switched to Linux. Finally settled on Clementine which has both a library & "file browser" mode.

In the browser mode you can just right click and add the folder to your playlist. Just like in foobar2000.

Re: Foobar2000

#173
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meh. Audacious + pulseaudio/alsa-plugins >>>>> foobar 2000. That for GUI. If you like CLI, mpd+any UI it's a beast. Mocp if you are a minimalist.

The problem (at least for me) is input format support. Assorted foobar2000 plugins support every obscure tracker format, every obscure video game music format (.vgz, etc.), and then foo_midi lets you render MIDIs not just with Soundfonts but with whatever VSTi DLLs you like. Also support for music files in ZIP files as well as music files in ZIP files in ZIP files (don't ask). That's hard to compete with.

mocp opens MODs/S3M's and so on. Everything else it's handled by fluid/timidity.

VSTi's? Pipewire now can do that at system level.

>Zip

Here in Unix I can just mount archives and disk images.

Re: Foobar2000

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't it similar to how your nickname is fsckboy, cleverly iterating over the well-established fsck utility? Or is that something else, because fsckboy is not a published product in the IT space?

fooboy would be perfectly fine: a doghouse is not a dog. and the namespace for humans is much more "lexically bound" so we don't tend to get confused when multiple people are named John, just as we don't get confused with multiple cases of foo used as a metasyntactic variable; in fact, we expect it, unlike foobar2000 which demands exclusivity. Does the "2000" in foobar2000 qualify it somehow? No. Do you make sure to…

Valid point! This makes foobar2000 not good in a way that fsckboy passes.

Re: Foobar2000

#175
post #70

Bit of a tangent but it's kind of infuriating to me that I still haven't found anything better than Winamp (or Foobar for that matter) on a modestly powerful Windows machine. Even 20 years ago, I could literally just right-click on an entire folder sitting on my external hard-drive, and it would immediately enqueue all of those files into Winamp. I even had a bunch of Winamp plugins that could automatically handle my…

For macOS Ionica is really really good: https://ionica.app/ For iOS I would suggest my own app Muziqi https://apps.apple.com/us/app/muziqi-for-music-lovers/id6468...

I use mpd and plexamp, but thank you for sharing...I really UX/UI of Ionica and hadn't seen it before.

Re: Foobar2000

#176

It's kind of strange I have never seen any other player where you can just click on a folder and play music from it. Like two clicks, one on a folder (which loads the list of tracks) and second to start playing this list of course it's doable in any player but not with such ease

I was looking for a player that had this functionality when I switched to Linux. Finally settled on Clementine which has both a library & "file browser" mode. In the browser mode you can just right click and add the folder to your playlist. Just like in foobar2000.

+1 for Clementine

Re: Foobar2000

#177
post #51

Related: Foobar2000 v2.0 Released - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35718802 - April 2023 (2 comments) Foobar2000 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30054239 - Jan 2022 (215 comments) Foobar2000 - the ultimate audio player - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1305796 - April 2010 (2 comments)

Wow, so 12 years without a post about fb2k on HN. That's a lot of time.

Re: Foobar2000

#178
post #76
post #26

It's great to see that fb2k is still around and well :) It's remarkable how they've kept the same UI since its inception, 21 years ago. It was clean, simple and intuitive back then, and still is today. Same goes for the website, now that I think of it. A true testament that simplicity trumps trend-chasing. It was my main music player after Winamp released the awful version 3.0, and I never looked back. I don't use Wi…

A remnant of simpler times. Foobar and VLC, any other software that has always worked and remained pretty much the same?

Media Player Classic The current actively maintained incarnation I use is https://github.com/clsid2/mpc-hc

Irfanview is another “goes on every desktop install”. I even use it on Linux via wine.

Re: Foobar2000

#180
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem (at least for me) is input format support. Assorted foobar2000 plugins support every obscure tracker format, every obscure video game music format (.vgz, etc.), and then foo_midi lets you render MIDIs not just with Soundfonts but with whatever VSTi DLLs you like. Also support for music files in ZIP files as well as music files in ZIP files in ZIP files (don't ask). That's hard to compete with.

mocp opens MODs/S3M's and so on. Everything else it's handled by fluid/timidity. VSTi's? Pipewire now can do that at system level. >Zip Here in Unix I can just mount archives and disk images.

> Here in Unix I can just mount archives and disk images.

This is so true! And it's much easier than just having the music player support zip files. Especially for zip-in-zip like GP described. Can you imagine double clicking an archive and have it play, rather than simply do:

    cd Downloads/
    ls
    mkdir tmp
    mount-zip myfile.zip tmp
    ls tmp
    mkdir tmp2
    mount-zip tmp/myinnerfile.zip tmp2
    audacious --new-instance tmp2 --play
    while killall -0 audacious; do
        sleep 1
    done
    umount tmp2
    umount tmp
    rmdir tmp2 tmp
Post reply on HN