Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: I am going to host "Real Analysis" book club meetings

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 61 posts

Re: Tell HN: I am going to host "Real Analysis" book club meetings

#13

Is the book online? I'd expect there are some that are. Will there be any Fourier analysis?

Judging from the initial topics listed "sequences and series, functions and continuity", it seems like this will be a beginning real analysis course.

Fourier analysis usually comes after we have covered differentiation, integration, metric spaces, basic topology at the very least.

Re: Tell HN: I am going to host "Real Analysis" book club meetings

#15
post #14

Anyone looking at Real Analysis might look at Terry Tao's book, which is both conversational and friendly but also rigorous, starting from set theory and building all the way up.

What is it called?

Analysis 1/2.

Re: Tell HN: I am going to host "Real Analysis" book club meetings

#17
post #9
post #2

Just curious, any reason why Rudin's text wasn't selected? (Although I see Howie's text is for an undergraduate level.)

I'm a math professor, who got through most of Rudin as an undergrad. Felt like a form of hazing at the time ;) In my opinion, Rudin is a great book if you're reading it under the guidance of a good teacher. For self-study, I don't know of any particular alternative to recommend, but I would select something more "talky" -- i.e. which goes more into the background, motivation, and philosophy of the subject.

I love Bartle’s Real Analysis myself. Little history each chapter on a figure who impacted the specific topic and good explanations. Not sure how it compares to Rudin though.

Re: Tell HN: I am going to host "Real Analysis" book club meetings

#20
post #9
post #2

Just curious, any reason why Rudin's text wasn't selected? (Although I see Howie's text is for an undergraduate level.)

I'm a math professor, who got through most of Rudin as an undergrad. Felt like a form of hazing at the time ;) In my opinion, Rudin is a great book if you're reading it under the guidance of a good teacher. For self-study, I don't know of any particular alternative to recommend, but I would select something more "talky" -- i.e. which goes more into the background, motivation, and philosophy of the subject.

I was a CS undergrad at MIT and took the fancy math people’s analysis class for a math requirement and they used Rudin and it killed me. We went through like 170 pages of it for one semester. The professor was Sigurdur Helgason. I went into office hours one day and ask him a question. He slowly walked to his window and replied “the ravines in Iceland are deep” and it was at that point that I realized I was an engineer and not a mathematician.
Post reply on HN