Earlier quoted context omitted.
For what is worth, I think Meta is lying about it, or at least playing the victim card too strongly. > They’re demanding that Meta provide free full services without personalized ads or a monthly fee for users. Meta is being sued because their paid plan is not honest - they are currently asking for 10€/month which is disproportionate - for comparison, a Business Standard Google Workspace account with 2Tb and Gemini c…
That is perfectly honest. If it were 10x that it would still be honest. Pay the price or don't use the service. Nobody owes you anything.
Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
731–740 of 761 posts
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#732Earlier quoted context omitted.
They send resumes with the same accomplishments and names that indicate race and observe the relative degrees of acceptance. Everytime they do this test, considerable bias is found to still exist.
Still using resumes, have an ai interview for knowledge and communication skill.
I think it gives a much higher signal on candidates than a resume, and is more "blind" in terms of bias than a human.
It's based on voice messages. Open to all here if anyone wants to take it for a spin. https://candit.net
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#733Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#734Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#735Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Not all progress is good progress. Adding lead to paint was progress at the time. Same with using asbestos for insulation. We’ve since decided that the costs outweigh the benefits there. Regulators should and do weigh both the harm and good of restricting the usage of new technology. The fact that they don’t always get it right isn’t a reason to stop regulation altogether.
That might or might not be wrong, but is certainly a typically European perspective. The U.S. Bill of Rights is full of clauses specifying things like "Congress shall make no law regarding..." freedom of speech, establishments of religion, etc. because of the notion that the government's inability to reliably get it right is indeed a good reason to stop altogether.
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#736Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah, the first iPhone was too expensive, slow, and limited in capabilities (no App Store). They quickly iterated to improve on all of that. The first watch also kind of sucked. The initial iPod wasn’t a blockbuster, either - didn’t work well on Windows, required FireWire. I’m sure there are other initial misses. I think there’s something there with Vision Pro, they just need to iterate and get the cost down.
Are you really saying the original iPhone was a "product miss"???
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#737Earlier quoted context omitted.
I dunno if you were alive at the time but that's not really what happened. The first iPhone was really expensive but people bought it anyway because it was sooo far ahead of the competition. Until the iPhone most people didn't even bother with smart phones because they were so bad (Blackberry was a partial exception). The web browsing wasn't slow - part of what made it so compelling was that you could browse the real…
>I dunno if you were alive at the time but that's not really what happened. I was pretty alive at the time, I was an intern on the iPhone team at Apple when it launched and the run-up, so I was using the first gen phone/touch all day every day, and I was paying pretty close attention to its launch (but just watching what was said in the press/by the people I knew, nothing privileged on the sales side). Looking around…
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#738Earlier quoted context omitted.
It quickly generates BS text that costs billions of man hours to generate by people doing BS jobs, which could be doing something more useful, such as childcare. I'm using it to quickly localize our application into different languages, such as Arabic. German took like a few hours to get from non existing to 100% functional. Arabic was sketchy with Arabic mixed with French text, now it's 100% Arabic.
> which could be doing something more useful, such as childcare. Ok but what is your plan for letting people who lost their jobs to AI to do more meaningful things? Because unless there are bigger societal changes all it means those people will not have to find jobs that are even more bullshit.
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#739Earlier quoted context omitted.
They can't buy anything unless Europeans are willing to sell.
What's your intended message? Yes, people sell things voluntarily. (In particular, small companies being bought and killed by monopolies is usually very benefitial to the small companies' owners, even if it's bad for the economy as a whole.) That does not contradict the parent comments.
If you do not want that, do not voluntarily sell your company.
I like my cat. I don't want others owning my cat. I probably shouldn't sell my cat then right? I can't take the money now and complain later the neighbor owns my cat.
Re: Europe is in danger of regulating its tech market out of existence
#740Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not that most people hate risk. It's that individuals whom are harmed by sociopathic individuals that exploit methodologies, techniques, and products to enrich, steal, and harm the population. (When I say that I mean financially, emotionally, socially, physically, etc). To add further insult to injury, defending ones self against these individuals is disproportionately impossible. Socially: Creating and cultivat…
> Stealing: Scooter companies are actively stealing the public space to operate their business (sidewalks), endorsing their users to run over people on the sidewalk (also making it difficult to identify the individual), etc. OMG I cannot wait for these companies to be fined out of existence. How can you be allowed to have a business model that relies on people leaving your trash wherever they feel like it.
What I got was: The alderman employee tried to get this cleared with the scooter company rather than towed.
I was blown away.. if I parked in front of the Division blue line station my car would be fined, towed, charged with storage fees, potentially vandalized within an hour. Them? Oh the gov employee will do CS for them. I filed a complaint with the city ombudsman and later found out she was removed.