Live data from Hacker News

Is Cloudflare overcharging us for their images service?

jpetazzo.github.io

11–20 of 136 posts

Re: Is Cloudflare overcharging us for their images service?

#11
post #7

[flagged]

"Adobe" and ___ "Intuit Turbo Tax" and ___ The brain automatically fills these up for me, Cloudflare isn't close (yet?)

To both of those companies credit they have never stuck me with a surprise bill after providing services for the amount of money they said they wanted to charge.

They have plenty of dark patterns, mind you, but post-paid usage-costed cloud services have so much more potential to mess you up.

Re: Is Cloudflare overcharging us for their images service?

#15
I would be interested to know pageviews/bandwidth because this feels like it's still at the scale of it could run on a single box (rather than Heroku or a whole kubernetes cluster as seems to be the current case). For reference, we served a genealogy image/audio/video site from two servers behind an LB for ~$60/mo and handled 100K pageviews a day with nary a bother.

Re: Is Cloudflare overcharging us for their images service?

#16

Cloudflare support being terrible and non-helpful? Say it aint so /s Seriously though, it feels like support exists as a hurdle to get to engineering. I have never had a serious issue that was resolved by support. I miss when customer engineers or customer support actually was treated like a value add part of the business.

The cheat code is to complain very loudly on Hacker News, which summons CFs CEO/CTO to deal with your problem.

Re: Is Cloudflare overcharging us for their images service?

#17
post #8

I wonder why they used an image platform specify and not just s3 or other data storage.

It does simplify a lot of things.

- Opportunistically serve more efficient image formats when browsers support them without converting/storing

- Cropping and resizing without needing to build your own compute to do it (no creating and storing thumbnails)

- Watermarking on the fly (e.g., on cropped images)

You could absolutely build it all yourself, but tying it all together with your CDN and handling user uploads safely and doing auth (so users can't, for instance, just remove a watermark) isn't very easy, and it's nice to have a managed service that just does the thing.

Re: Is Cloudflare overcharging us for their images service?

#19
post #8

I wonder why they used an image platform specify and not just s3 or other data storage.

The article notes that the image-centric EphemeraSearch uses image services like Cloudflare Images and Cloudinary to do more than just simple file serving, which the author and his partner would otherwise have to build. But the conclusion notes that Cloudflare Images is ultimately not worth the cost for their use case, and that "it’s likely that we will replace Cloudflare Images in the long run".
Post reply on HN