151–160 of 181 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use the most obscure fork of Android possible, learn the most obscure language in Africa and set your UI to that language, ...
Aaaaand with the bootloader unlocked, they'll just grab the Cellebrite and/or call up Cellebrite Professional Services for remote unlock assistance. https://cellebrite.com/en/advanced-services/ The biggest thing is to set your device up on arrival to be powered OFF. Most of Cellebrite (and other security vendors) solutions rely on the phone having been unlocked once since first poweron (or "AFU").
And with GrapheneOS you can relock the bootloader, once you've installed it.
Source:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41072905
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/14344-cellebrite-premium-ju...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I find more egregious is, if this somehow sticks, non-USA citizens are still not protected from these invasive searches. This should be a human rights issue, not a local law.
Non-citizens don't have a right to cross the border.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
remove English from the OS
People that travel to the US usually want to actually get into the US. Why would they make it hard on themself?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-citizens don't have a right to cross the border.
If they have a visa, of course they have the right.
Edit: add source 1. https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/visa-waive...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Imagine if it were actually one of your social media handles , though [what I wrote above]. Just as example, I'm one of those weirdos with the vehicle tag "No Plate" — never received anything but laughs from police officers.
You should change your license plate to ' OR 1=1; DROP TABLE licenses; --
null void
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not OP but almost all of Europe comes to mind.
A continent where laws capable of sending you to prison for freely expressing certain opinions is your counter example to a lack of certain advanced individual rights in the U.S.
https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores?sort...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I find more egregious is, if this somehow sticks, non-USA citizens are still not protected from these invasive searches. This should be a human rights issue, not a local law.
Non-citizens don't have a right to cross the border.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oddly enough, there are screen-sharing and/or remote-display protocols which ... are limited to sharing screen-drawing properties and aren't wholesale data vacuums. X11 and remote desktop come particularly to mind. Several of those can be limited to specific applications, e.g., by setting the $DISPLAY value (X11). For remote desktop that's a bit more challenging but can be managed to an extent using Group Policy sett…
It is not screen sharing… It is more like plugging a monitor on a laptop. It’s exactly how the phone does it under the hood: it’s a secondary display.