Earlier quoted context omitted.
> sick of rent control being vilified Not vilifying it. Saying that tracking who is the legal owner and beneficiary of a property is tough. Given the present market state, I wouldn’t be surprised if such a tax measure increased rents.
> Saying that tracking who is the legal owner and beneficiary of a property is tough. That doesn’t pass the sniff test - the legal owner has to pay property taxes so why can’t they track it that way? If it’s a trust then it’s the beneficiaries that are the owners. In the absence of rent control i can see landlords just forwarding the cost of taxes, but that’s where I’m a huge proponent of it. Discourage investing in…
...the legal owner would pay the property tax. The beneficial owner/controller would reimburse them.
> In the absence of rent control i can see landlords just forwarding the cost of taxes, but that’s where I’m a huge proponent of it. Discourage investing in homes unless you really have the capital
This reminds me of the effect of squatters' rights on rents. It discourages property owners becoming landlords.
You're increasing the cost of owning rental property while lowering its yield. What do you think will happen? Why not offer a tax deduction for landlords voluntarily submitting their properties to rent control, similar to conservation easements?