CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
blogs.wsj.com
CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#2How can the WSJ report such nonsense? Bigger displays do not increase bandwidth usage as far as I know.
Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#3Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#4I kept the title honest but I submitted it specifically because the article says, "But it may also wreak havoc on CIOs’ networks and connectivity budgets — better quality displays require more network bandwidth, which allows users to increase data consumption." How can the WSJ report such nonsense? Bigger displays do not increase bandwidth usage as far as I know.
Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#5Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#6Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#7I kept the title honest but I submitted it specifically because the article says, "But it may also wreak havoc on CIOs’ networks and connectivity budgets — better quality displays require more network bandwidth, which allows users to increase data consumption." How can the WSJ report such nonsense? Bigger displays do not increase bandwidth usage as far as I know.
Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#8Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#9The only way this can be an issue if everyone's running off remote access and running it at the highest resolution without compression.
Re: CIOs Beware: New Macbook Pro Will Be a Bandwidth Hog
#10I kept the title honest but I submitted it specifically because the article says, "But it may also wreak havoc on CIOs’ networks and connectivity budgets — better quality displays require more network bandwidth, which allows users to increase data consumption." How can the WSJ report such nonsense? Bigger displays do not increase bandwidth usage as far as I know.
Thanks for the laugh. Wow.