31–40 of 134 posts
How is this different from Scite, Elicit, Consensus, and Scopus AI for Generating Literature Reviews
How is this different than the work that semantic scholar is doing around AI?
Semantic Scholar seems more focused on 1. being the data provider/aggregator for the research community, and 2. long term, I think they plan to develop software at the reading interface that learns as a researcher uses it to browse papers (a rich PDF reader, with hyperlinks, TLDRs, citation contexts, and a way to track your interactions over time, and remind you of what you've seen or not). Their core feature now is…
this was the search https://www.undermind.ai/query_app/display_one_search/cba773...> if you need a reference too it, ie bugs or performance monitoring...
let’s say i am interested in coffee and i’d like to get new research papers on it. would this work?
Curious as to what it's doing under the hood, the query to return the results takes an excruciatingly long time... are you searching remote sources vs a local index? this was the search https://www.undermind.ai/query_app/display_one_search/cba773... > if you need a reference too it, ie bugs or performance monitoring...