61–70 of 192 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It could be Israel or an entity that purchased a licence. One way or another Israelis probably know who it was.
I'm an "Israeli" and I have no clue who it was.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This piece might be relevant: https://www.leefang.com/p/inside-the-pro-israel-information
It’s a minor effort compared to the hundreds of millions Iran, China, and Russia have spent for a decade on influence operations. Those get little air time in hard progressive or far right spaces since these anti liberal influence operations mostly promote hard progressive and far right perspectives.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This piece might be relevant: https://www.leefang.com/p/inside-the-pro-israel-information
It’s a minor effort compared to the hundreds of millions Iran, China, and Russia have spent for a decade on influence operations. Those get little air time in hard progressive or far right spaces since these anti liberal influence operations mostly promote hard progressive and far right perspectives.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/10/sheldon-adel...
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/republican-mega-donor-adels...
I'm pro-Israel, but the current Israel government is widely called far right by the mainstream media, so I don't not know what to make of your comment at all.
If you talk about general influencing: It has been known for decades that the USSR and its successors have influence operations. No need to mention it. It would be interesting though to follow the money: Perhaps your innocent "liberal" mainstream operation that is anti-meritocracy and therefore undermines the West is financed by Russia.
Sounds more like it missed. They sent him a link, and he was wise enough to not click on it.
I wonder how that was supposed to work? Am I to believe that they have exploits for every browser engine on every OS that infect my phone just by visiting a page? Chrome on Android and WebKit on iOS? That would be concerning, but how realistic is that?
Also these attacks are aimed at individuals and executed by state actors. They likely already knew what phone, OS, and browser the MEP was using and selected an appropriate attack from the catalog.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This applies to any Western government interest group, at least for small submissions or individual comments that relate to those organizations. Large ones like the Assange release cannot be suppressed, but are full of pro-government comments that would not have been made by any software engineer before 2015. So either the engineers have changed fundamentally, or ...
Or what? Your comment was truncated for me.
(just the logical conclusion of the statement, intentionally made blank)
Interesting that they named their company after the Amazonian fish that can supposedly swim up your penis and lodge itself inside
Seems to be a pattern in these circles - there's at least also Palantir, named after the crystal ball that corrupted Saruman in The Lord of the Rings.