161–170 of 372 posts
Dumb question here :- My father has diabetes since he was 30, my grand father had it too in his 30s. I am beginning my 30s, will I get it too ? Is it guaranteed that I'll get it ? Can I avoid getting it ? Both my father and grandfather had heart attacks...
Yeah, by losing weight. Unless the reason they got it is because of some autoimmune timebomb that's genetically programmed to go off in the 30s and destroy the pancreas.
I'm T1D and currently working on something like this because diabetes healthcare in the UK is effectively non-existent past diagnosis. Managing the condition isn't too difficult after 30 years of it, but dealing with the politics of NHS diabetes care is astronomically more difficult than it was in any decade previously. In my experience, if you are not pregnant, or you aren't at risk of passing out in the next 15 min…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the US, my experience has largely been that it's not healthcare, it's sickcare. Wait until sick, get treated. Annual checkups are a weight check, blood pressure, a few questions, maybe a blood panel if you're lucky, and then a "you look great see you next year", aka, come back when you're sick. I spent the last few years seeking proactive healthcare and the "system" is very much stacked against you. If you're fort…
None of those things are necessary most of the time, and they’re usually just going to make you paranoid. It’s why doctors don’t generally like to do full-body scans on healthy people: they’re rarely going to find anything clinically significant, but they’re often going to find something that causes a scare and some unnecessary tests. (And if the scan is a CT scan, on average, the radiation may cause more cancers tha…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's funny that we only apply this "more data = bad" logic to things that aren't readily visible. If you have a palpable or visible likely-benign condition that isn't causing symptoms, such as a mole, rash, or lump, every doctor will recommend getting that checked out. Most of the time it'll turn out to be completely innocuous, but you'll go to the doctor and they'll decide between it's fine, monitoring, invasive inv…
> Obviously if the test itself is invasive (e.g. has a dose of radiation) then that is something that needs to be compared against the potential benefit. A test isn't always a binary 'you have X ' . Look at PSA screening for prostate cancer starting in your 40s is not recommended for that reason.
Say you're 40 and you get a positive PSA result, maybe that means your risk of having prostate cancer has gone from (for illustrative purposes) 0.1% to 2%. That means the next step is "what do you do to someone who has a 1 in 50 chance of having prostate cancer?", and the answer is almost certainly not a biopsy or anything majorly invasive. The answer might be a finger up the butt, an MRI, monitoring for symptoms, repeat the test in a year, etc.
The problem is that patients aren't used to handling these ambiguous results from tests because we don't do much routine testing, and doctors don't want to face the potential consequences for getting a positive test result and recommending against invasive treatment. However, in many cases, a test would still tell you something useful even if it won't directly be used to escalate to a more invasive test or treatment.
For example, if a routine blood test shows prediabetes (which has happened to a few people I know when having blood tests for unrelated matters), you won't get any treatment for it, but you may be referred to a dietician and have a fire lit up under your ass to make those lifestyle changes you've been putting off.
What I've learned that, as an adult in 2024 in the United States, you cannot take for granted: - That your medical professionals are acting in your best interest - That your insurance company is acting in your best interest - That your medical professional knows what they are talking about - That things that are legal to put in your body will not cause irreparable harm to you - That the legal level of pollutants in t…
I think the problem is that you were raised to think that a "good and just" world is one where there is no risk, no variability, and limited self-reliance. This is a fiction and has never existed.
The default state is for none of these services and protections to exist whatsoever. Everything beyond nothing is an imperfect and unstable solution held together with duct-tape.
It’s all vibes! Type 1 here for 28 years. You are on the right path here but I think you are missing the “big players” for lack of a better term. The prediction software available now (open source) is quite good and works with different types of CGMS and pumps. You are really going to want to look at Loop. Loop basically collects the inputs in the app automatically for insulin if you use a pump. I’m on the Omnipod DA…
Not a diabetic and I live in one of the richest countries with a social medical system, but the medical industry is an abject failure. My experience with most Doctors who are not surgeons has mostly been that are overpaid for doing essentially nothing and think all their patients are hypochondriacs.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
None of those things are necessary most of the time, and they’re usually just going to make you paranoid. It’s why doctors don’t generally like to do full-body scans on healthy people: they’re rarely going to find anything clinically significant, but they’re often going to find something that causes a scare and some unnecessary tests. (And if the scan is a CT scan, on average, the radiation may cause more cancers tha…
Understanding the results does take education, I agree with that, but having more data over time seems much better than flying blind and then being surprised when something actually does happen.
What I've learned that, as an adult in 2024 in the United States, you cannot take for granted: - That your medical professionals are acting in your best interest - That your insurance company is acting in your best interest - That your medical professional knows what they are talking about - That things that are legal to put in your body will not cause irreparable harm to you - That the legal level of pollutants in t…
What I've learned that, as an adult in 2024 in the United States, you cannot take for granted: - That your medical professionals are acting in your best interest - That your insurance company is acting in your best interest - That your medical professional knows what they are talking about - That things that are legal to put in your body will not cause irreparable harm to you - That the legal level of pollutants in t…
>I understand that some people would look at that list and say I should have never expected some of those, but pardon me for being propagandized at a very young age that we lived in a country that was good and just. That's my bad I think the problem is that you were raised to think that a "good and just" world is one where there is no risk, no variability, and limited self-reliance. This is a fiction and has never ex…
I'm with you. One quick look at history shows nothing is set in stone and it can always get worse.