Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
#2Re: Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
#3What's the other side of the story though? Why was he removed?
They also seem to say:
“We took outside legal advice on the situation and the process at multiple points, and it was duly followed. For the purposes of limiting legal liability, that advice also included making the announcement very terse and factual. I appreciate this is at tension with the transparency that the community would hope to see, but Directors are also obligated to look after the Foundation’s legal requirements and financial interests.”
Re: Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
#4What's the other side of the story though? Why was he removed?
Re: Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
#5Re: Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
#6Re: Sonny Piers response after removal from the GNOME Foundation board
#7What's the other side of the story though? Why was he removed?
AFAICT, all the public was told is that it was “for cause” ( https://discourse.gnome.org/t/updates-to-the-gnome-foundatio... ) They also seem to say: “We took outside legal advice on the situation and the process at multiple points, and it was duly followed. For the purposes of limiting legal liability, that advice also included making the announcement very terse and factual. I appreciate this is at tension with the…