Earlier quoted context omitted.
Since government is creating massive problems already, such as the global debt crisis, I really don't think all encompassing planetary government is a good idea at all. People seem to think nothing could ever go wrong with such a concept. But history tells another story about government. We've had some very bad totalitarian governments. I'd rather not trust any single organization that will never face any competition…
> I'd rather not trust any single organization that will never face any competition. Neither would I. That would be silly. Can you tell me what government is? In my experience, people who are afraid of governments becoming totalitarian cannot seem to grasp what the government itself is. Would you be an exception to this trend?
Study predicts imminent irreversible planetary collapse
81–84 of 84 posts
Re: Study predicts imminent irreversible planetary collapse
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'd rather not trust any single organization that will never face any competition. Neither would I. That would be silly. Can you tell me what government is? In my experience, people who are afraid of governments becoming totalitarian cannot seem to grasp what the government itself is. Would you be an exception to this trend?
A sovereign government is a monopoly on the use of force over a given territory. I would hate to have no ability to escape a government if it became tyrannical. A global government makes escape impossible.
Re: Study predicts imminent irreversible planetary collapse
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can predict your political orientation with fairly high confidence based on this comment alone.
So in other words, this is such a politicized issue there's no way to have any discussion about the facts?
This is the age of irrationality.
Re: Study predicts imminent irreversible planetary collapse
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know, but I also want to point out that "often proven to be predictive" is pretty weak cheese. I mean, I have a model for predicting the result of coin flips which is often predictive. It's called "heads".
Are you suggesting that models are not a useful scientific tool?
"A model...[is] really much more of a metaphor, an attempt to find an analogy between something you want to understand and something to really do understand, either heuristically or by a theory."
from http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2012/03/derman_on_theor.htm... - very good interview.