Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Why should I make an account?
X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
11–20 of 240 posts
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#12That's the problem with Firefox these days: The management has been so bad that the market share tanked and now market actors can afford to block FF users who are privacy conscious without risking a big outcry. A sign of things to come…
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#13all x/twitter links have been login-walled for me for quite some time now, probably since around the time Elon took over, so I just stopped clicking any links or visiting the site entirely... since I literally can't if I wanted to anyways (I refuse to make an account and nitter stopped working).
[flagged]
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#14Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#15all x/twitter links have been login-walled for me for quite some time now, probably since around the time Elon took over, so I just stopped clicking any links or visiting the site entirely... since I literally can't if I wanted to anyways (I refuse to make an account and nitter stopped working).
[flagged]
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#16That's the problem with Firefox these days: The management has been so bad that the market share tanked and now market actors can afford to block FF users who are privacy conscious without risking a big outcry. A sign of things to come…
In fairness, Strict Tracking Protection is not a Firefox problem; it is very clearly a Firefox feature. The problem is the sites. X is not really an important site anyway.
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I, for one, don't make accounts on services with a hate speech rate as high as current Twitter. I'd consider an account an indirect endorsement.
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I, for one, don't make accounts on services with a hate speech rate as high as current Twitter. I'd consider an account an indirect endorsement.
What is wrong with respecting people's right to have opinions you don't like? Isn't that what everyone wanted?
Edit: I just committed hate speech!
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#19A similar refusal is observed on Mobile Safari.
Re: X.com refuses to open with Firefox strict tracking protection enabled
#20This is not any different.