Live data from Hacker News

Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

neilzone.co.uk

11–20 of 377 posts

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#11
I kind of get why we don’t like this in email, but for SMS and Slack I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reactions. They’re a way to say “I received this and have a positive reaction to it, with no further communication necessary”.

Replaces a lot of useless typing I had to do to sound polite when saying “fine, no further comment”. And then getting a notification from the other party acknowledging my acknowledgment… yuck.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#12

I kind of get why we don’t like this in email, but for SMS and Slack I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reactions. They’re a way to say “I received this and have a positive reaction to it, with no further communication necessary”. Replaces a lot of useless typing I had to do to sound polite when saying “fine, no further comment”. And then getting a notification from the other party acknowledging my acknowledgment… yuck.

I would love to disable that on my client. I never want to see reactions.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#13
post #12

I kind of get why we don’t like this in email, but for SMS and Slack I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reactions. They’re a way to say “I received this and have a positive reaction to it, with no further communication necessary”. Replaces a lot of useless typing I had to do to sound polite when saying “fine, no further comment”. And then getting a notification from the other party acknowledging my acknowledgment… yuck.

I would love to disable that on my client. I never want to see reactions.

Genuine question: why?

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UX problem is you send an e-mail, and someone "thumbs up" a response, and then you block the response and assume that they didn't care to respond, while they think they have responded.

The distance between "didn't care to respond" and a thumbs up emoji response is measured in angstroms.

With a thumbs-up I know they've read it, and that's worth quiet a bit in this asynchronous communication world of ours.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#15
post #3

The reaction email doesn't have some specific header that can be used to block it?

The UX problem is you send an e-mail, and someone "thumbs up" a response, and then you block the response and assume that they didn't care to respond, while they think they have responded.

No. When you block an email the sender will get a notification email from their mail server that their message was blocked. They will not assume anything for very long.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#16
post #12

I kind of get why we don’t like this in email, but for SMS and Slack I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reactions. They’re a way to say “I received this and have a positive reaction to it, with no further communication necessary”. Replaces a lot of useless typing I had to do to sound polite when saying “fine, no further comment”. And then getting a notification from the other party acknowledging my acknowledgment… yuck.

I would love to disable that on my client. I never want to see reactions.

Honestly if someone were to send me a message that only required a simple acknowledgement, and that person hypothetically had disabled reactions, I would interpret that as that person not wanting their message to be acknowledged. But I suspect what you’re really wanting is typed acknowledgment?

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UX problem is you send an e-mail, and someone "thumbs up" a response, and then you block the response and assume that they didn't care to respond, while they think they have responded.

The distance between "didn't care to respond" and a thumbs up emoji response is measured in angstroms.

I suppose it'd be OK if the other side of your TCP connections stopped sending ACKs.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#18
post #4

Oh, this is good to know! I haven't encountered this issue personally yet, but maybe once I've updated my mailserver, I won't encounter it in the future. Now to figure out how to stop the same thing happening in SMS.

You'll be glad to hear that SMS already doesn't have reactions

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UX problem is you send an e-mail, and someone "thumbs up" a response, and then you block the response and assume that they didn't care to respond, while they think they have responded.

The distance between "didn't care to respond" and a thumbs up emoji response is measured in angstroms.

The distance between "not detectable" and "detectable" is vast and significant, no matter how minute the unit of measurement.
Post reply on HN