Live data from Hacker News

California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

thinc.blog

101–110 of 120 posts

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so? Would the Federal regulators have done a better job of making CenterPoint invest the right amount of money into tree trimming and placing lines underground? California is under Federal regulation and has significant problems where PG&E hasn't invested enough in reliability. If California just breezed through every natural disaster with no power outages and lower than Texas energy prices it would truly be a no…

Hello from Alameda, CA. 15.5c per kwh here except for M-F 5pm-9pm, where it is 50c.

Oh wow! Thanks for the info. I'm glad to hear it's not crazy everywhere out there.

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you meam they are doing consumer PV+battery installations, or actual battery systems for utility companies?

You asked about industrial players, I responded with industrial players I have seen. https://www.power-eng.com/energy-storage/batteries/spearmint... https://en.sungrowpower.com/newsDetail/2127/sungrow-supplies...

Thanks, and thank you for the links. Very interesting to see movement in this direction.

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-03-08/tesla-is-... | https://archive.today/xU9Kg https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2024/01/12/Tesla%20BESS%20G... Gambit Energy, owned by Tesla in Texas. Megapack supports grid forming in production (Hawaii and South Australia installations as well). “Virtual Machine Mode.” It is solved, which shouldn’t be controversial considering Tesla’s power control maturity.

Thanks for the link, looks like it is new development in the last 2 years which is the blink of an eye in utility timeframes.

Happy to help, another link you might find useful on the topic.

https://cleantechnica.com/2024/07/14/new-grid-forming-invert...

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> we found that the total annualised cost (including capital, operation, maintenance and fuel where relevant) of the least-cost renewable energy system is $7-10 billion per year higher than that of the “efficient” fossil scenario. For comparison, the subsidies to the production and use of all fossil fuels in Australia are at least $10 billion per year. So, if governments shifted the fossil subsidies to renewable elec…

That's an Australian academic in 2013 making that claim, and fair play to him, the official Australian cost estimates in 2024 say: > ‘Firming costs’ is a term often used to describe the investments needed to make variable renewables a reliable source of electricity for our power system. In the GenCost report our preferred term is ‘integration costs’. > Integration costs include investments in storage, peaking generat…

What cost of storage do they use in their model in dollars per kilowatt hour?

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Batteries installed on concrete slabs are easier and cheaper, there are only so many places pumped hydro is feasible. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40919052

NZ recently scraped Lake Onslow seasonal hydro storage. My estimate it was about 100x cheaper per kWh when compared with Powerwall.

Can you provide background and/or context as to how and why this decision was made?

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#106
post #62
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can't anywhere that has significant elevation should just pumped storage of water during the day and use hydro on the way back down?

Do the math on how much energy you can store-- the volumes required for meaningful amounts of energy are just mind boggling. So you don't just need elevation, you need thousand of acres of valley or crater that you can flood and people tend to get a little testy about geoengineering at those scales these days.

Meh? Couple hundred meters of elevation and a hundred acres runs a city for day. Source - the city I live in which has this exact setup.

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an Australian academic in 2013 making that claim, and fair play to him, the official Australian cost estimates in 2024 say: > ‘Firming costs’ is a term often used to describe the investments needed to make variable renewables a reliable source of electricity for our power system. In the GenCost report our preferred term is ‘integration costs’. > Integration costs include investments in storage, peaking generat…

What cost of storage do they use in their model in dollars per kilowatt hour?

Why is it up to us to read these reports for you?

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#109
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do the math on how much energy you can store-- the volumes required for meaningful amounts of energy are just mind boggling. So you don't just need elevation, you need thousand of acres of valley or crater that you can flood and people tend to get a little testy about geoengineering at those scales these days.

Meh? Couple hundred meters of elevation and a hundred acres runs a city for day. Source - the city I live in which has this exact setup.

Indeed, but that is the scale you have to work at for it to be interesting... on the order of a billion gallons of water, if I assume it's 10m deep.

Re: California Grid Breezes Through Heatwave with Batteries

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What cost of storage do they use in their model in dollars per kilowatt hour?

Why is it up to us to read these reports for you?

Lol because you’re citing it. A study is not a magic spell you cast to immediately win arguments. Every study makes assumptions and you have to be prepared to discuss and defend them if you cite one. Another basic question, how much energy storage does their model require, because its probably way less that would actually be required. For comparison, this study of Germany found 56 TWh of storage to be optimal assuming a hypothetical and very cheap hydrogen storage system. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4dc8#...
Post reply on HN