Live data from Hacker News

Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

unihertz.com

101–110 of 276 posts

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iPhone 4 was the apex of phone design, I will die on this hill!

It was the Pre 3 [0] and I'll fight you for it. Lol. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Pre_3

Hah! Sliding keyboard, that absolutely rocks!

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, the iPhone minis did not really fly, apparently.

God, I wish "not being wanted by at least 100M people" didn't disqualify products from existing.

I mean, it disqualifies products from existing at reasonable price points.

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not as big a problem as you make it out to be due to the availability of alternative Android distributions. A quick search shows that LineageOS 20 already runs well on this device which means it should be possible to keep it up to date for a long time. I'm using a Samsung SIIIneo from 2014 with LineageOS 18.1 (Android 11) for which LineageOS 20 is available as well while Samsung dropped support at Android 4.4…

I find it hard to universally recommend LineageOS because it can be a true 'your mileage may vary' situation depending what you use it for, which is fair enough for the fruits of a volunteer project. It's great if your aim is to get an old phone on a more recent release, but as they're not pretending that they're official firmware some apps won't work with that if they want the integrity check. Those apps can be broa…

Sorry to hear that. Like others in this thread, LOS has been great for me (Essential phone model)

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#105
Some years ago, for a reason I can't remember, I was browsing tiny phones (not smartphones) in a Chinese e-commerce site. I was amazed by the vast range of devices in this category (at the time).

After a few Google searches trying to understand why there was demand for such small phones, one article suggested that these phones are perfect for getting smuggled in prisons "you know how". Don't know if this is true, but it sounds plausible and the vast range of devices could be explained by this.

They were tinier than the smartphone in this article, though.

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#106
post #65

Japan has some nice small phones for kids. Although the specs are quite basic. https://youtu.be/AmthGJ5Qwvk?feature=shared https://onlineshop.smt.docomo.ne.jp/products/detail.html?mob...

I don't think there is any with official or unofficial Play Store support. Japanese phone are rarely flashable too.

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#107
post #105

Some years ago, for a reason I can't remember, I was browsing tiny phones (not smartphones) in a Chinese e-commerce site. I was amazed by the vast range of devices in this category (at the time). After a few Google searches trying to understand why there was demand for such small phones, one article suggested that these phones are perfect for getting smuggled in prisons "you know how". Don't know if this is true, but…

Yep. Good for kiestering.

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#108
post #70

It's a bit too small, but I like that it's a thing. However, for my own use, I want something in-between. A 4" phone would be ideal. I'm still confused how there aren't any phones for people who still use a computer as their primary means of accessing the internet . Even for this one, the media review section makes it look like it's "to distract oneself from social media". As if a phone's primary purpose isn't to be…

I bought one to carry on while doing physical activities and, eventually stay connected.

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was the Pre 3 [0] and I'll fight you for it. Lol. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Pre_3

Hah! Sliding keyboard, that absolutely rocks!

Somehow it's been 13 years and none of the available phone OSes have managed to be as usable or user-focused as WebOS was. Nor as easily hackable. The hardware was smooth like a river rock in your pocket, but still had an easily found physical slider switch to silence the device. It had wireless charging as a standard feature. And the software stack was familiar to any desktop Linux user with just a custom display layer on top. Complex multi-tasking was effortless on it (thanks in part to the gesture area and also the OS's cards interface). And it combined all contacts and messages regardless of communications channel into a unified interface. Oh, also, replaceable batteries!

Unfortunately HP played musical CEOs (three in less than a year) and one of them didn't see phones or PCs as businesses they should be in.

Re: Jelly Star – The Smallest Android 13 Smartphone

#110
post #3

I've been using this phone as my full time phone for 1 year. It's a great compromise for people that ideally would not want a smartphone, but need to have one since many life situations require it. I basically only use it for WhatsApp and music, but when some other need arises, it can do everything a normal smartphone can do. The only problem is that the build quality is not good. The audio jack of the first one I bo…

Interesting. The headphone jack would be my main reason for buying this thing. Recently forgot my iPad on a trip, and couldn't listen to anything on the plane because my goddamned iPhone lacks a headphone jack. So offensively stupid.

There are other android alternatives that have a headphone jack - though getting fewer each year unfortunately. I want a phone that takes good pictures, has long feature updates, and has an aux jack - I haven't been able to find one in years, so I've been compromising with ones that only get one new android version (plus security updates for 2-3 years)
Post reply on HN