Live data from Hacker News

52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

abc.net.au

21–30 of 31 posts

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#21

The caps are melting and some people are all in on bringing back the woolly mammoth. How about the woolly rhino while we're at it? Maybe open a zoo in Death Valley to house 'em.

Gotta reproduce that mammoth jerky somehow.

Yeah, it's not like it's gonna grow on trees... or maybe it will?

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-58709069

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#22
I personally think successfully resurrecting the Thylacine and reintroducing it longterm to Tasmania would be a better aim over all these comments on Mammoth cloning

Advantages: - smaller (but still a macro-sized animal) - multiple surrogate options rather than just African Elephants - the ecosystem would be better with its capstone apex predator back - it only died out so recently that it has footage from zoos

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gotta reproduce that mammoth jerky somehow.

Yeah, it's not like it's gonna grow on trees... or maybe it will? https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-58709069

I'm not eating no tree jerky. Only from cloned mammoths like God intended.

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#24
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Curiously, it turns out that elephants eating fauna actually promotes plant and tree growth. I remember reading something (ca 2007?) about the possibility that reintroducing elephants to the American Southwest could lead to reforestation of areas that are currently desert. Which, of course, doesn’t really provide good justification for de-extinctifying the mammoth (although as I say this, I wonder if they might acual…

Pleistocene Park and albedo. I don't think you've got this exactly right, it's about grassland, not forest. Also forest is supposedly bad for permafrost, raising temperature slightly. > Pleistocene Park is a truly fascinating and daring experiment in the far Arctic, in Siberia, run by the Zimovs, Sergey and Nikita Zimov, a father and son scientific team, and their families. And they have this theory that large megafa…

The forestation was more around elephants in lower latitudes, but I’m going with nearly 20-year-old vague memories.

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#25
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In that case the humans started the global warming when made the mammoths extinct - how ironic, the industrial revolution is just the top of the cake

Agriculture in general significantly reduced the amount of carbon trapped in vegetation. One of the causes of the Little Ice Age is often proposed to be the reduction of human population (and correspondingly, land area under cultivation) and reforestation after the Black Death, Mongol invasions, and the Columbian Exchange.

The cooling associated with the Little Ice Age started in the 13th Century (per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age#Dating), though, while the Black Death was in the 14th.

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#26
post #22

I personally think successfully resurrecting the Thylacine and reintroducing it longterm to Tasmania would be a better aim over all these comments on Mammoth cloning Advantages: - smaller (but still a macro-sized animal) - multiple surrogate options rather than just African Elephants - the ecosystem would be better with its capstone apex predator back - it only died out so recently that it has footage from zoos

Unlike the elephant / mammoth pairing, there aren't any marsupials similar to Thylacine (as far as I know). What surrogate options did you have in mind?

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#27
post #22

I personally think successfully resurrecting the Thylacine and reintroducing it longterm to Tasmania would be a better aim over all these comments on Mammoth cloning Advantages: - smaller (but still a macro-sized animal) - multiple surrogate options rather than just African Elephants - the ecosystem would be better with its capstone apex predator back - it only died out so recently that it has footage from zoos

Unlike the elephant / mammoth pairing, there aren't any marsupials similar to Thylacine (as far as I know). What surrogate options did you have in mind?

I believe there is an effort to use the fat tailed dunnart as a surrogate. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat-tailed_dunnart

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#28
post #17

Is ti possible to do this for the giant ground sloth too, or there is no well preserved DNA sample for it so far?

So it would run amok and climb a skyscraper?

A girl can dream, can’t she?

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#29

The caps are melting and some people are all in on bringing back the woolly mammoth. How about the woolly rhino while we're at it? Maybe open a zoo in Death Valley to house 'em.

Keeping open options is not madness,even in times of madness. Times change,but the capabilities persist.

Re: 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

#30
post #17

Is ti possible to do this for the giant ground sloth too, or there is no well preserved DNA sample for it so far?

So it would run amok and climb a skyscraper?

It weighted up to 5 tons. It didn't climb, but dug tunnels: https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20231127-brazils-mysterio...
Post reply on HN