Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
torrentfreak.com
Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
1–10 of 116 posts
Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#2I'm also tired of people preaching about how piracy is unethical. A copied piece of data is not equivalent to a lost sale. People cannot own information. You cannot own an algorithm or idea. Imagine if Newton owned the laws of motion, imagine if he owned calculus. How can someone own an arrangement of words or sounds. If you think piracy is unethical you are either a dolt or benefiting from current copyright and patent laws.
edit: And let us not forget the primary purpose of these laws. The purpose wasn't so you could get insanely wealthy off of an idea. It was to provide an incentive for people to create and learn. Copyright and patent laws are now doing the opposite.
Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#3Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#4Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#5That's an approach... Open source textbooks are another: http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/CNP3
Students who don’t pay can’t participate in the course and therefore get a lower grade.
The patent kind of forces students to buy the material.Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#6Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#7I have teachers that won't actually use textbooks because kids at my school cannot afford them. Professors will actually photocopy the material for us.
Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#8I'm somewhat confused as to how this would work. Surely the university is responsible for awarding the degree and academic staff choose a supporting textbook to help students? So I assume universities wanting to use a textbook don't have to adopt the system.
Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#9 No access code means a lower grade, all in the best interests of science.
I ... no. I can't even...I'm sorry, but I find it very hard to summon an inkling of sympathy for the publishers' plea against piracy when I see measures like that.
When I failed calculus because I didn't prove a theorem the way it was in the lecture notes and then was insane enough to argue the point, I thought it was pretty stupid. Here, I don't think the word even begins to describe the situation.
Commodity. That's a good way of describing the role of the students. It shows a rather alarming failure of the system that instead of incentivizing the pursuit of knowledge, students are set up for failure and milked for as much money as possible during their education.
I know a patent doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things, and I do hope that most people in a position to make decisions in education call it out for being stupid, though I feel that's a tad optimistic. I'm just sad that a professor is the one proposing this. There go my non-existent beliefs in academia.
Re: Anti-Piracy Patent Aims to Stop Students from Sharing Textbooks
#10I've already participated in classes where an online code was required to access the publisher's homework... same idea really.