Live data from Hacker News

Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

theverge.com

141–150 of 181 posts

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#141
post #52

I'm in a subculture where people mostly don't own televisions (I do watch shows on my laptop, occasionally) but so I have never seen motion smoothing - is there a demo, online, like on youtube or something, that can give me a sense of what you are talking about?

mpv can do it, look into manpage, I do not immediately remember the param.

I have tried it, and it is horrible.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tell me, mr. Ad-man, what good is an ad network... without an internet connection? I recently got my hands on a "smart TV" for free because the power supply was broken and the replacement the owner had bought did not work. That turned out to be due to the fact that he bought the wrong board so I used parts from both boards to create a working power supply and there I was with a working "TCL 50DP660", this turned out…

Totally off topic, but I have wondered for 30 years where Information Society got “a knife and a fork, a bottle and a cork, that’s the way to spell New York”, because it was clearly intended as a sample or re-creation. Now I’m one step closer.

Well, great, now I’m going to have that stuck in my head.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#143
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes that is my favorite part of the apple tv as well, that it adjusts output to the source frames and resolution. As long as you have a good looking panel with nice color you'll never need to get rid of it. 1080 can really look gorgeous even with everything today being 4k

My 2013 Panasonic plasma is still going strong with AppleTV as the primary input source.

Same here. I have a Panasonic Plasma hooked to the AppeTV 4K in the bedroom, and the picture quality is awesome.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I cannot fathom being totally okay with manufacturers being able to retroactively change features of a product after you've purchased it and without your consent. I can! It's a thing that presumably I was happy with for some amount of time. Things change. > Would you be okay with your airpods suddenly deciding that they can only pair with sufficiently new apple devices Yes! It's a risk of buying something. I can ev…

Are you okay with a bait and switch executed on a shorter time frame? How about a third party breaking into your house and breaking your things, or is that only alright when the original manufacturer does it?

> Are you okay with a bait and switch executed on a shorter time frame

If I pay for it, I’m OK with it. If I decide I’m not OK with it, I’ll either not buy it or learn my lesson and make a different decision in the future.

> How about a third party breaking into your house and breaking your things, or is that only alright when the original manufacturer does it?

Why don’t you take a wild guess here?

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#145

I don't know what this looks like but I probably hate it. It's like the frame interpolation that some TVs had to generate 120p frames from 60p. I actually prefer the original 24p (or 24p double-exposed to 48 like cinema projectors do) for films. What really bugs me are the "Remastered" versions of songs on Spotify that sound like they were produced with today's audience in mind and doesn't sound like the original rec…

Another thing that annoys me endlessly: a few months ago, Apple Music introduced animated cover art and then proceeded to animate album covers that shipped decades before Apple Music existed. If modern artists want to use this for their new albums, or if an artist wants to rethink the album artwork for a remaster, fine. But, Apple deciding to do a shoddy job of moving the Beatles to another layer and having it pulse in and out on the cover of Abbey Road? Fuck that.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you okay with a bait and switch executed on a shorter time frame? How about a third party breaking into your house and breaking your things, or is that only alright when the original manufacturer does it?

> Are you okay with a bait and switch executed on a shorter time frame If I pay for it, I’m OK with it. If I decide I’m not OK with it, I’ll either not buy it or learn my lesson and make a different decision in the future. > How about a third party breaking into your house and breaking your things, or is that only alright when the original manufacturer does it? Why don’t you take a wild guess here?

[deleted]

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#147

I don't know what this looks like but I probably hate it. It's like the frame interpolation that some TVs had to generate 120p frames from 60p. I actually prefer the original 24p (or 24p double-exposed to 48 like cinema projectors do) for films. What really bugs me are the "Remastered" versions of songs on Spotify that sound like they were produced with today's audience in mind and doesn't sound like the original rec…

> I don't know what this looks like but I probably hate it. A simple description would be: It makes film movies look like direct-to-video productions, so basically everything looks like a soap opera. Horrible indeed.

It butchers animation, which is carefully drawn at certain intervals. There's a reason you can pause anime at any frame and it will look like a defined, static image without blurring and smearing.

Motion smoothing absolutely destroys the look of the motion.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#148

The article says... > If you’re someone who doesn’t notice motion smoothing or doesn’t particularly care about it... This basically is me. It then proceeds to describe a number of things that would be blatantly obvious and asks you to imagine if you couldn't turn them off. Yes, if my Kindle's fonts all went 3x size, I'd both notice and probably care. But this "logic" fails to work with that previously quoted sentence…

No one's asking you to care. Some people wouldn't notice tripled text size, even though it's similarly hard for me to imagine. I usually notice motion interpolation within a second of watching. I also find it to be intolerable. Maybe people like you can come out ahead on the newly reduced prices on these RokuTV's with recently reduced market value.

I think I got my first Roku device in 2008? So far quite happy.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There were way more than 10 people who read, commented on, and liked that Verge article. Both your assumptions (that we're an extreme minority, and that Roku thinks that way) seem to be only supported by the conclusion you make from them. All that said, putting the feature in enabled by default and seeing how many people end up disabling it would be how they could be grounded in reality and avoid creating a shitstorm…

Yeah, we are not an extreme minority. My wife - who really doesn’t notice SD vs HD, let alone 4k, if the aspect ratio is correct for the screen - went ape when we got a TV with motion smoothing. I said yeah, I hate that too, give me a few minutes to fix it, believe me I don’t want it.

I don’t think I know of _anyone_ who prefers it on.

Re: Dear Roku, you ruined my TV

#150
post #52

I'm in a subculture where people mostly don't own televisions (I do watch shows on my laptop, occasionally) but so I have never seen motion smoothing - is there a demo, online, like on youtube or something, that can give me a sense of what you are talking about?

This video isn’t really worth watching in entirety, but it’s one clip with motion smoothing on and off, so you can skip around to get the idea: https://youtu.be/INQrxHREmJ0?si=E5v3L-gZ__BrUHyC This video has a longer explanation: https://youtu.be/62noXbp-l9o?si=aZqIre3sJy2SpOo7

So I see a lot of stuttering during panning in that video. With motion smoothing on, almost no stuttering. How can anyone prefer the stuttering version?

https://youtu.be/INQrxHREmJ0?t=211

Post reply on HN