Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

withtelescope.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 132 posts

Re: Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

#32

Post by knuckleheads »

baxtr wrote: post #11

What I learned recently was that all the SEO tool basically query the same back end provider. So I guess it makes sense that there is innovation on the pricing model side of things. We use ubersuggest which has a lifetime pricing, quite neat.

Would that happen to be Majestic by chance?

Re: Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

#33

Post by nickreese »

kulhavy wrote: post #4
cranberryturkey wrote: post #2

looks cool do you have a trial version?

There is no trial version, but there is a "trial" balance you get after a sign up to try the application. Feel free to contact me on X (Twitter) @ilyakulhavy if you need a little more, thank you!

Dropped you a note.

Re: Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

#35

Post by scientific_ass »

This is super cool and I would love to try it out. We use SEMrush and they are basically charging us +$1000 dollar for the basic plan, with every other feature as an add-on for addition $200 - $400.

Question: Do you have (or plan to provide) features like -

-- Questions around the seed keywords

-- Keyword exports for external analysis with details like volume, difficulty, etc,

-- Can I tag keywords if I save them in a particular list?

In my work, I do SEO research almost every day and have a very extensive keyword strategy. So above features are what's keeping me stick to SEMrush.

Re: Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

#36

Post by baxtr »

mikkom wrote: post #30
baxtr wrote: post #11

What I learned recently was that all the SEO tool basically query the same back end provider. So I guess it makes sense that there is innovation on the pricing model side of things. We use ubersuggest which has a lifetime pricing, quite neat.

Please enlighten us about the backend provider, I'm interested. It seems the OP of this thread is using the same backend as he's not willing to tell it. edit: Ubersuggest mentioned by someone says in dev blog https://neilpatel.com/blog/ubersuggest-update/ > My data feed from SEO Power Suite, Data For SEO, and Shared Count totaled $75,253 for January. Is this the backend mentioned? Some direct links for others interes…

I casually read it on twitter, I can't find it anymore. Bummer. I should have bookmarked it

Re: Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

#38

Post by mikkom »

baxtr wrote: post #36
mikkom wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please enlighten us about the backend provider, I'm interested. It seems the OP of this thread is using the same backend as he's not willing to tell it. edit: Ubersuggest mentioned by someone says in dev blog https://neilpatel.com/blog/ubersuggest-update/ > My data feed from SEO Power Suite, Data For SEO, and Shared Count totaled $75,253 for January. Is this the backend mentioned? Some direct links for others interes…

I casually read it on twitter, I can't find it anymore. Bummer. I should have bookmarked it

I fortunately found some details myself too (edited the parent), thanks anyway

Re: Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool

#39

Post by glenngillen »

matrik wrote: post #26
baxtr wrote: post #11

What I learned recently was that all the SEO tool basically query the same back end provider. So I guess it makes sense that there is innovation on the pricing model side of things. We use ubersuggest which has a lifetime pricing, quite neat.

what’s the name of the backend provider?

Majestic
Post reply on HN