> [re a slide-to-unlock patent] Apple’s .. argument is that “a tap is a zero-length swipe.” That’s silly. It’s like saying that a point is a zero-length line. But a point is a zero-length line.
Not exactly. Even if you disregard the definition arguments discussed below, and allow the definition of "line segment" to include "point" I would not say that a point is a zero length line segment. It seems to me that the "lenght" of a point, if such a concept is to be allowed, is infinitely small but not zero. Thus, a point has length of lim(x->0) x. To me, a zero length line segment would be nothingness. But putti…
Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
71–80 of 133 posts
Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#72Nice quote from a different judge: "The court is well aware that it is being played as a pawn in a global industry-wide business negotiation."
Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#73What a wonderful surprise. I'd forgotten about the judicial branch, and now they appear like the cavalry to sort out this mess. Wouldn't it be great if they went after the patent trolls next?
It worked for Jefferson/Madison/Hamilton 222 years ago. This could be exactly what we need.
Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#74Judge Posner is indeed a brilliant and highly-respected jurist and his views on our problematic patent system will undoubtedly resonate and help the cause of reform. In his courtroom role as such, though, he can have only limited impact on the broader patent debate. The judge entered a tentative ruling saying that he was inclined to dismiss the entire case on the merits with prejudice (meaning, to kill all the claims…
The problem is that these kids have weekly allowances in the hundreds of thousands. And most lawyers do not discriminate among potential clients by maturity level, they discriminate by net worth. They are happy to become instruments of a sandbox squabble, for a price. The kids don't do the squabbling. They pay lawyers to do it for them.
Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#75Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#76Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
The number of comments disagreeing with his post certainly helps explain why we've gotten in such a mess.
To be fair, calling Alan Greenspan an advocate, let alone a practitioner, of laissez-faire economics is kind of like calling the pope an atheist.
Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#78Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#79What a wonderful surprise. I'd forgotten about the judicial branch, and now they appear like the cavalry to sort out this mess. Wouldn't it be great if they went after the patent trolls next?
I would like Paul Graham, Richard Posner, and perhaps Mike Bloomberg to have a long, meandering dinner party wherein they discuss and solve America's most important problems. It worked for Jefferson/Madison/Hamilton 222 years ago. This could be exactly what we need.
Seriously though, you want 3 privileged, white men to decide the fate of your entire country? I'm all for smart people coming up with solutions, and I know your comment wasn't mean't to be taken too seriously, but this is just ridiculous. Technocracy is not the answer, no matter how much technologists would love it to be.
Re: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system “dysfunctional”
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair, calling Alan Greenspan an advocate, let alone a practitioner, of laissez-faire economics is kind of like calling the pope an atheist.
Since he was one of the contributors to Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1966, http://www.amazon.com/dp/0451147952 ), one of the more influential laissez-faire manifestos of the late 20th century, I think it's fair to say that he was an advocate of laissez-faire economics during at least a portion of his life.