Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
blog.ethereum.org
Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
1–10 of 35 posts
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#2> The threat actor exported the blog mailing list email addresses, which was a total of 3759 email addresses.
3700 addresses doesn't seem like that much at all.
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#3I'm mostly surprised by the number of subscribers > The threat actor exported the blog mailing list email addresses, which was a total of 3759 email addresses. 3700 addresses doesn't seem like that much at all.
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#4I think of stage coach robberies of US bonds, and the various bank “rug-pulls” (to use crypto fraud nomenclature) that occurred before the Coinage act of 1857 - but it’s such distant history it’s hard to find how people felt about it at the time.
What I’m getting at is this - is crypto fraud innate to it’s very essence, or did all “advancements” in banking technology have the same problem before everyone settled in and “got used” to attempts at fraud.
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#5Off the cuff thought, but I wonder if the early days of modern banking were marred with such blatant fraud and deceit. I think of stage coach robberies of US bonds, and the various bank “rug-pulls” (to use crypto fraud nomenclature) that occurred before the Coinage act of 1857 - but it’s such distant history it’s hard to find how people felt about it at the time. What I’m getting at is this - is crypto fraud innate t…
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#6I'm mostly surprised by the number of subscribers > The threat actor exported the blog mailing list email addresses, which was a total of 3759 email addresses. 3700 addresses doesn't seem like that much at all.
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#7I'm mostly surprised by the number of subscribers > The threat actor exported the blog mailing list email addresses, which was a total of 3759 email addresses. 3700 addresses doesn't seem like that much at all.
A) no crypto enthusiast or speculator needs to be subscribed to the ethereum foundation’s blog since 2014, which was 10 years ago for reference. But even then forums and twitter worked well enough for resyndicating news.
B) Its more likely they pruned the mailing list multiple times after every bull cycle, asking people if they still wanted to be subscribed to reduce complaints and bounce rates. Crypto bear markets are deep doldrums.
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#8Off the cuff thought, but I wonder if the early days of modern banking were marred with such blatant fraud and deceit. I think of stage coach robberies of US bonds, and the various bank “rug-pulls” (to use crypto fraud nomenclature) that occurred before the Coinage act of 1857 - but it’s such distant history it’s hard to find how people felt about it at the time. What I’m getting at is this - is crypto fraud innate t…
Re: Blog.ethereum.org Mailing List Incident
#9Off the cuff thought, but I wonder if the early days of modern banking were marred with such blatant fraud and deceit. I think of stage coach robberies of US bonds, and the various bank “rug-pulls” (to use crypto fraud nomenclature) that occurred before the Coinage act of 1857 - but it’s such distant history it’s hard to find how people felt about it at the time. What I’m getting at is this - is crypto fraud innate t…