Minimalism takes time to perfect.
And for those who are wondering: nobody commented on my wardrobe.
51–60 of 207 posts
Minimalism takes time to perfect.
And for those who are wondering: nobody commented on my wardrobe.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/meatstravaganza/5793064302/in/g...
It's also a look that will be difficult to pull off when she's 20 years older. For some reason, women have to dress their age. My guess is because there is so much societal pressure for women to look younger that there is significant backlash when the effort becomes too transparent.
Men have it easy. A well fitted Saville Row cut suit has been relatively fashionable for at least a century. The only thing you'd have had to change would have been the tie, and you would have had to lose the hat about 50 years ago.
Leggings are a great solution for women, but I'm still looking for a non-jeans everyday pair of pants for men. Something stretchy and comfortable, that can be dressed up and that I can ride my bike in.
I think I have 12 pairs of pants in active rotation and they should keep me going for a few years.
I like form fitting pants for a number of reasons:
1.) Your cuffs don't stretch out over your shoes and get all mangled by walking on them. Not a good look and it reduces the lifespan of your clothing.
2.) You don't need to roll up your pant legs when biking, as the pants are in no danger of coming in contact with the chains.
3.) They are somewhat revealing and add to sex appeal. Yes, this sort of stuff matter for men as well as women.
[clarification: I found the pixel art in this post to be incredibly helpful and relevant.]
The 8-bit renderings are cute, but actual pictures would be nice.
I feel like a creep digging through her flickr to find a picture, but I honestly was just curious about the clothes. This one seems most like what was described in the post. http://www.flickr.com/photos/meatstravaganza/5793064302/in/g...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recently helped a female friend move out of an old apartment, and I was absolutely astounded by how much clothing she had lying around. It surprised me because she came off as a stylish, but not terribly fashion-centered person. By my rough estimate, this list represented probably 1/5 of my friend's clothing. Granted, a sample size of 1 is not terribly informative; however, my gut feeling is that a women's wardrobe…
...she came off as a stylish The author is definitely NOT stylish by any reasonable definition of this word. Hence the difference in the wardrobe size. Things like "ethical" or "green" consumption only make situation worse.