Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm pretty sure that with time, they will be forced to let users choose the model. Just like it happened with the search engine...
Wouldn't this require Chrome to download models on the fly or pre-package multiple models? That doesn't really seem possible (mobile data connection) or convenient (Chrome binary size, disk space) for the user.
Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
171–180 of 194 posts
Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#172Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#173Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#174And how do I turn this cancer off permanently?
Use Firefox.
[0] https://github.com/mdn/yari/issues/9208 [1] https://github.com/mdn/yari/issues/9230
Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#175AI brain rot continues but now it's reaching unimaginable levels and infecting browser APIs, wow!
Why is it brain rot? It still blows my mind that it’s even possible for a low-power device to talk and behave like us. For all practical purposes, LLMs pass the Turing test. This a major leap forward in human innovation and engineering. IMO, this could be as influential as the adoption of electricity/setting up of the power grid.
Are you okay?
Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#176If this is the API that Google are going with here: const model = await window.ai.createTextSession(); const result = await model.prompt("3 names for a pet pelican"); There's a VERY obvious flaw: is there really no way to specify the model to use? Are we expecting that Gemini Nano will be the one true model, forever supported by this API baked into the world's most popular browser? Given the rate at which models are…
Testing LLM/AI output sounds like an oxymoron to me.
Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
What a needlessly hostile and cynical blog post. I also can't relate to their appraisal of copilot. It's been an incredible productivity booster for me in how it removes so much cognitive load that's tangential to the problem I'm solving. It mostly completes the same line/s I was about to type, sometimes even pointing out an error in my code when the output is odd. It's also awesome when it spits out 20+ lines unexpe…
Funny, that's been pretty much the opposite of my experience with Copilot (or any other LLM-based code assistant). It constantly spits out lines that are similar to what I was planning to write, but are subtly wrong in ways that take me more time to figure out and fix than it would have to just write it myself in the first place. It's handy if I want a snippet of example code that I could've just found on Stackoverfl…
Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#178Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Browser extensions should be able to shim or even overwrite the `.ai` object in the window, so it should be possible to add ollama etc to all browsers through extensions with the same API, making it a defacto standard It should be simple enough to do that I believe at least 3-5 people are going to be doing this if it's not done already Hell, if nobody does it I will do it
It's already done: https://windowai.io
Re: Chrome is adding `window.ai` – a Gemini Nano AI model right inside the browser
#180My first impression is that this should enable approximately what Apple is doing with their AI strategy (local on-device first, then filling back to a first party API, and finally something like ChatGPT), but for web users. Having it native in the browser could be really positive for a lot of use cases depending on whether the local version can do things like RAG using locally stored data, and generate structured inf…
i dont like that you take this as a given. we as users choose.
> I don't think this is a terrible idea.
it's deplorable