Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This Court has long understood Chevron deference to reflect what Congress would want, and so to be rooted in a presumption of legislative intent. Congress knows that it does not—in fact cannot—write perfectly complete regulatory statutes... I really hope she meant to convey a different point here, because it reads as if congress doesn't care and wants unelected bureaucrats figuring out what laws mean because they t…
I would much rather unelected bureaucrat scientists decide how to implement the intent and application of laws than congress.
You're assuming these people are actually dispassionate scientists and not, ya know, political appointees.