I'd rather work on a team that did their best to make sure there were no duds even at the expense of missing a genius, so long as everyone that did make it was on right side of the bell curve.
My spiciest take on tech hiring
81–88 of 88 posts
Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#82This is not a very spicy take. A spicier take is that you can hire people without administering any interviews at all. Hire like an orchestra: through an audition process, which, in a work setting, is also known as "work-sample testing". It works a treat.
What senior person wants to do this?
I've since used that method when I was a hiring manager, both for technical roles, and even a Manager of Compliance. Was extremely successful, both for us on the hiring side, as well as two very good hires.
Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
In practice this almost never happens. Most contract to hire roles don't appropriately pay you like you're a contractor (really should be at least 3x salary) and get worse/desperate candidates who will take an unsecure job with no benefits for 3-6 months. Real human beings with real responsibilities are usually looking for fulltime work or they're running their own business and charging you for services.
Many contractor orgs provide benefits during the contracting period and pay at least 1.5x salary before the employee comes aboard as a full employee. Also, as so many others have stated on this site, many people just as talented or better than in silicon valley aren't looking for 500k+ a year because they don't live in a hyperinflated shithole, but that's another topic altogether. All I can say is salary is relative…
Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#84spyrecovery36 @ gmail com if you need access to your partner’s phone
Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#85Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#86Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#87Re: My spiciest take on tech hiring
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's roughly how Apple became Apple. Computers as a lifestyle. Google could have made the world googley, but they kept the googley to themselves.
Every single successful Google product except Search, Gmail and Chrome was an acquisition. The last two almost didn't even get released and the third relied on poaching a bunch of Firefox engineers. Google can't build anything, only buy.