Live data from Hacker News

A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

phoronix.com

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#11
post #7

Wow, my employer sucks and is blocking Phoronix. Anyone want to summarize this until I can check it from home?

Six dual-core PandaBoard ES boards stuck in a wooden dish-drying rack :) One of these draws a max of 5-6 watts under heavy load, so the whole "rack" should stay around 30 watts during cluster benchmarking etc. It's not completely assembled yet so there are no real numbers. Total cost about $1500.

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#13
post #11
post #7

Wow, my employer sucks and is blocking Phoronix. Anyone want to summarize this until I can check it from home?

Six dual-core PandaBoard ES boards stuck in a wooden dish-drying rack :) One of these draws a max of 5-6 watts under heavy load, so the whole "rack" should stay around 30 watts during cluster benchmarking etc. It's not completely assembled yet so there are no real numbers. Total cost about $1500.

I was seriously considering trying something like this with either the Raspberry Pi or the APC " rel="nofollow">http://apc.io/>.

It looks like one PandaBoard can roughly match the CPU horsepower of four APC boards at a slightly lower price, so that's good to know. The Raspberry Pi might still beat out the PandaBoard in terms of purchase cost-to-Megahertz ratio. We'll see. :-)

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#15
post #5

For comparison, you can now get http://ark.intel.com/products/65703/Intel-Core-i5-3470T-Proc... http://ark.intel.com/products/65735 http://ark.intel.com/products/65714/Intel-Core-i7-3517U-Proc...

You're giving Intel graphics as a pro for servers using OpenCL? Either way, I don't know about this set-up, but next year a set-up with Cortex A15 and Mali T658 will have shared cache between CPU and GPU, which should be a lot more efficient than anything Intel or even AMD has today regarding GPU compute. From what I understand cache "latency" between CPU and GPU is a pretty big problem in the desktop space, and this…

> Cortex A15 and Mali T658 will have shared cache between CPU and GPU, which should be a lot more efficient than anything Intel or even AMD has today regarding GPU compute.

Intel's had cache (last level cache, LLC in the diagram below) since January, 2011:

http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/sandybridge/ar...

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm probably just missing something, but can you explain how the concept is going to fix cache latency CPU GPU?

I'm assuming this: Cortex A15 and Mali T658 will have shared cache between CPU and GPU is what you're looking for.

I thought Intel next architecture, Haswell, was going to have the same feature?

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#17
I like the idea of independently replaceable boards, but the drying rack isn't the answer. It may be great for heat dissipation, but you'd be surprised how many dangers are present in an apparently empty room (dust, ceiling leaks, your hipster keychain, etc.).

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#18
i surely would like to see a follow up of this article here at hackers news. I feel less environmental guilty if i can build a pc with a low power usage.

But as far as i can see, this 'beast' of 12 cores, its not a high end system it runs around 1.3 GHZ ? Do 12 cores makeup for low speed ? there is also a 8 core buldozer amd at around 75 watt but with double the Ghz speed if i remind corectly (thats equals about 35 wat to ratio of 16 cores)

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#19
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm assuming this: Cortex A15 and Mali T658 will have shared cache between CPU and GPU is what you're looking for.

I thought Intel next architecture, Haswell, was going to have the same feature?

No (at least to the same degree), but AMD's next architecture will, and in a much more interesting form.

Re: A Cheap 12-Core, 30-Watt Ubuntu Cluster

#20

For comparison, you can now get http://ark.intel.com/products/65703/Intel-Core-i5-3470T-Proc... http://ark.intel.com/products/65735 http://ark.intel.com/products/65714/Intel-Core-i7-3517U-Proc...

Ok, but then maybe you'd want a small and cheap cluster gather knowledge on cluster deployment and management. I am sure interested in the type of stuff. I guess you will hit scale problem sooner on an underpowered motherboard. What do you think ? Oh, and as already said by other, wattage is for the whole board. That said I am curious about how they will actually power this cluster.
Post reply on HN