Live data from Hacker News

Can men live without war? (1956)

theatlantic.com

101–110 of 237 posts

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#101
post #14

In an ideal future, firearms would be banned worldwide. A body like interpol would investigate the entire world, to surveil if anybody is trying to make firearms. People would make bows and spears, but it would be more difficult to conduct war. It would not make war and violence impossible, but it would certainly be a better world. EDIT: lots of pedants: obviously there would be an joint army answering to an internat…

Ideal for whom? I and many others own firearms and would like to continue owning firearms.

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#102
post #96
post #12

Fascinating article...written not that long after it looked like men or anybody else could never live with war again. But, those fretting about the necessity of war need not have worried, as subsequent events proved. War between nuclear powers doesn't happen any more, but instead we've had endless proxy wars. Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine....

Ukraine is uncomfortably close. Nuclear armed combatant on one side, and proxy on the other.

Russia is a North Korean 'proxy'. With South Korea considering lethal aid, Ukraine may soon be a 'proxy' of South Korea.

In the end, Russia made their own decision to invade, and the Ukrainians' own decision to resist.

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#104
post #59
post #14

In an ideal future, firearms would be banned worldwide. A body like interpol would investigate the entire world, to surveil if anybody is trying to make firearms. People would make bows and spears, but it would be more difficult to conduct war. It would not make war and violence impossible, but it would certainly be a better world. EDIT: lots of pedants: obviously there would be an joint army answering to an internat…

Why would they make bows and spears, but not guns? That seems a fairly arbitrary technological line to draw.

To ensure the natural advantage that strong people have over weak people, of course. Nature has ordained that the strong should subjugate the weak, and the equalizing force of firearms is thus an afront to nature, and is not to be tolerated!

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#106
post #23

The thing is without force your stuff gets taken. We haven't got a good way around this. Our current peace is heavily based on nuclear weapons and the implied threat of force. Don't like the status quo? Use force to try to change it. Do like the status quo? Use force to try to keep it that way. We don't have a stable equiliubrium where no force exists in the system. Many in this thread effectively say "You can do wha…

1945 gave us a way out of this equilibrium. Not the nukes. The Bretton Woods principles. It was not a kumbayah exchange of platitudes. It was an agreement to let things be settled in the free market. Want more oil from Nigeria? Offer them more money than the other buyers. Want to fish the waters around Tuvalu? Radio them and offer more money. Want Congolese cobalt? Same idea. This was the brainchild of John Maynard K…

I mean, the fact that we're no longer in the Bretton Woods agreements means they failed as universal solution-finding principles

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#108
post #14

In an ideal future, firearms would be banned worldwide. A body like interpol would investigate the entire world, to surveil if anybody is trying to make firearms. People would make bows and spears, but it would be more difficult to conduct war. It would not make war and violence impossible, but it would certainly be a better world. EDIT: lots of pedants: obviously there would be an joint army answering to an internat…

What happens when someone gets to head Interpol and decides they want to become a dictator? And worse, everyone else in Interpol agrees that they should be dictator?

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#109
post #12

Fascinating article...written not that long after it looked like men or anybody else could never live with war again. But, those fretting about the necessity of war need not have worried, as subsequent events proved. War between nuclear powers doesn't happen any more, but instead we've had endless proxy wars. Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine....

> War between nuclear powers doesn't happen any more

That might change as more nations acquire nuclear weapons. Or maybe the pathway to world peace is to give every country nukes.

Re: Can men live without war? (1956)

#110
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every culture in every corner of the world throughout known history.

So far. Hence, education / culture issue.

The evidence points to an uninterrupted stream of human violence throughout all history. Meanwhile, you speculate --without basis-- that this will be solved via education, positing some pedagogical or cultural breakthrough that somehow has evaded humanity for all of its existence. What do you think that will be?
Post reply on HN