Anyone got a guestimate as to the energy used to make that leaderboard?
Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
11–20 of 136 posts
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#12Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#13Is it even possible to have cheaper first character SHA256 algorithm?
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#14Anyone got a guestimate as to the energy used to make that leaderboard?
There's 13 8s, so that's 1365Wh. 5 9s is 8400Wh, 2 10s is 53760Wh, 3 11s is 1290240Wh.
Total that's ~1.35MWh, which might cost $100 to $180. Very weak estimate, though.
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#15Would it make sense to have some partial/incremental SHA256 implementation? E.g. one that gives the first character only (in ASCII representation). So that you could have a cheaper money miner to narrow down the search space? Is it even possible to have cheaper first character SHA256 algorithm?
There isn't a known way to calculate just the first bytes of a SHA256 hash faster. Each step in SHA256 depends on the value of the previous step, so you have to calculate the whole thing through. SHA256 is meant for cryptography and would be considered vulnerable to attacks if a shortcut were known.
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#16Anyone got a guestimate as to the energy used to make that leaderboard?
ChatGPT says a desktop CPU uses 105Wh for every hour of maxed computations. I think a hash with 8 leading zeros takes around an hour and every additional 0 takes 16x that. I'll ignore anything less than 8 0s and disregard how close the hashes are to gaining or losing a 0. There's 13 8s, so that's 1365Wh. 5 9s is 8400Wh, 2 10s is 53760Wh, 3 11s is 1290240Wh. Total that's ~1.35MWh, which might cost $100 to $180. Very w…
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#17Anyone got a guestimate as to the energy used to make that leaderboard?
ChatGPT says a desktop CPU uses 105Wh for every hour of maxed computations. I think a hash with 8 leading zeros takes around an hour and every additional 0 takes 16x that. I'll ignore anything less than 8 0s and disregard how close the hashes are to gaining or losing a 0. There's 13 8s, so that's 1365Wh. 5 9s is 8400Wh, 2 10s is 53760Wh, 3 11s is 1290240Wh. Total that's ~1.35MWh, which might cost $100 to $180. Very w…
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
ChatGPT says a desktop CPU uses 105Wh for every hour of maxed computations. I think a hash with 8 leading zeros takes around an hour and every additional 0 takes 16x that. I'll ignore anything less than 8 0s and disregard how close the hashes are to gaining or losing a 0. There's 13 8s, so that's 1365Wh. 5 9s is 8400Wh, 2 10s is 53760Wh, 3 11s is 1290240Wh. Total that's ~1.35MWh, which might cost $100 to $180. Very w…
The top competitors are very likely using GPUs, I guess that would make this cost much much lower...
But seletskiy is, as you can see in his nonce which tells us that he uses an RTX4090 and has 18 Giga Hashes per second. I'm really curious how he wrote that program, as I have a Rx 7900 XTX and would love to use it for this competition haha
Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#19Re: Show HN: SHAllenge – Compete to get the lowest hash
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
ChatGPT says a desktop CPU uses 105Wh for every hour of maxed computations. I think a hash with 8 leading zeros takes around an hour and every additional 0 takes 16x that. I'll ignore anything less than 8 0s and disregard how close the hashes are to gaining or losing a 0. There's 13 8s, so that's 1365Wh. 5 9s is 8400Wh, 2 10s is 53760Wh, 3 11s is 1290240Wh. Total that's ~1.35MWh, which might cost $100 to $180. Very w…
FWIW getting 8 0s took me 30 seconds, 9 0s definitely less than an hour, but after that I only got lower 9 0s, and 10 0s do not seem to be in sight