Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a very cynical take. I've not seen anything to make me think this feature is intended for surveillance as opposed to personal utility. The personal utility benefits are very clear to me - the problem is the ease with which malicious attackers might steal the data (if they can breach the system).
> This is a very cynical take. But also very correct. > I've not seen anything to make me think this feature is intended for surveillance as opposed to personal utility. Now that's a very naive take. They already use tons of telemetry to profie you for ads, snitch about you to your boss, share with partners, and so on, and only growing on that front. Plus all the cooperation they do with their favorite government.
Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
191–200 of 485 posts
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lets be honest, if Apple did it, it would be hailed revolutionary. Different customer base.
To enforce your point, rewind.ai has been doing it on mac for a while now and I havent seen anything but good reports about it. https://www.rewind.ai/
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not quite true: The other huge group of customers is simply gamers.
Genuinely asking: is that huge in terms of their install base or revenue, or is that huge in terms of PR ramifications (like, "vocal minority" type of deal)? In my younger days I'd've had a heavily skewed pro-gamer and pro-authority-of-the-gamer-rabble viewpoint, but now at this phase of my life I can't help but feel the majority of the places I see Windows are all in business and education contexts (so just business…
Now, we can't say for sure how many of these users primarily use their PC for gaming. But it's probably a lot of them. PC gaming is huge, and it's one of the few areas where a general consumer actually needs a PC, and can't use a phone or tablet.
[1]: https://store.steampowered.com/charts/
[2]: https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Softw...
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if you can't afford a Mac, and you're not technically literate enough to install Ubuntu ? Speaking for myself, I dual boot mint and windows because I really like playing games and making music. Both of those are absolutely subpar on Linux. Outside of our nerd bubble, most normal people don't really want to run desktop Linux. Macs are great, but I can't really game on them.
What is this laptop that costs less than a Mac but is good for gaming?
Most people playing games or on a desktop, not a laptop.
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#195Since this functionality can pretty much be replicated with OBS Studio + a keylogger I would love to know what keylogger/screen recorder software combo everybody is already running on their own machines
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
My takeaway is that Microsoft has been trying to boil the frog, but slipped and turned the temperature up too quickly. They're retreating for now, but make no mistake that Recall will slowly trickle back into Windows under another name. Every major power broker wants something like Recall to become the norm - bosses to spy on their employees, governments to spy on their citizens/enemies, and tech CEO's to collect tra…
This is a very cynical take. I've not seen anything to make me think this feature is intended for surveillance as opposed to personal utility. The personal utility benefits are very clear to me - the problem is the ease with which malicious attackers might steal the data (if they can breach the system).
Something doesn’t need to be designed with the intent to surveil to be used by the state for that purpose.
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#197Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same way as .NET FOSS, MS <3 Linux and such happened, by having a captain on the bridge that actually cares to make it happen, not sure if that is still Satya though.
If I understand the modern security issues correctly, this is all happening on Azure, correct? Windows is relatively secure, but their cloud has too much legacy compatibility/tech debt? For example, Kerberos support in Azure AD led to the some of the latest issues?
Most stuff is built with .NET, Go, Java and Rust, while the hypervisors are based on Windows (Azure Host OS[0]) it isn't the same as regular Windows, and most workloads are Linux based, officially > 60% [1].
Finally, starting this year, Azure has new security guidelines, all new software is to be written in managed languages, if a GC is not an impediment, Rust otherwise.
Writing code in either C or C++, is only allowed for existing products, with the related security guidelines in place[2].
[0] - https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-os-platform-b...
[1] - https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/virtual-machines/...
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
My personal feelings aside, Microsoft is Too Big to Suck like this, regarding security and privacy. At this point, their culture is a national security liability. We have seen some recent efforts, but how does one right such a large ship? https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/14/brad_smith_microsoft_... https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/3/24119787/microsoft-cloud-e...
Put DevDiv’s bosses in charge of WinDev.
Re: Microsoft to delay release of Recall AI feature on security concerns
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your post could've been written in 2004, when Microsoft was pinky swearing it was gonna refocus on security-first development, starting with XP SP2
To be a bit fair, Windows security has gone from a laughing stock in 2004, to having Windows Defender in the 2020s. I ain't no city slickin' infosec guy, but Defender appears to be state of the art end point protection today. They can figure this stuff out sometimes, right? How did they get from Windows/AVG/ESET to Windows Defender, and how can they make that happen on Azure?