Live data from Hacker News

Group chats rule the world

sriramk.com

101–110 of 194 posts

Re: Group chats rule the world

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 9 inches or more Ah, we are talking of internet inches I guess? The vast vast vast majority of men don't have 9" inches or more.

Yes, being rich affords you access to the right side of the bell curve

This is even worse phrasing than when people say "order of magnitude more" and mean "more", because it makes you think everything is normally distributed, but it isn't.

Re: Group chats rule the world

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This left me wondering if there is enough demand for smaller social networks with very limited visibility that can foster rich and insightful discussions (although this sounds like forums from the nineties). And if it's possible to keep the sales people away, or at least invite-only. You can't keep sales people a.k.a phonies away it will always happen. Every underground subculture gets appropriated as soon as even…

> Sadly, can't punch people in the face over the internet. Even worse everything is all about forced inclusivity now. Nobody is going to do that anymore because we don't all have lead poisoning from gasoline fumes.

wat?

Re: Group chats rule the world

#103

Speaking of group chats, I recalled an interesting story how MSN Messenger lost Chinese market. Back in 2003ish, MSN Messenger was THE shit in China. QQ, the competitor of MSN Messenger by Tencent, was losing ground rapidly, especially to white-collar users in big cities. To Microsoft, MSN Messenger probably was a toy, but to Tencent it was life and death. So QQ launched group chat. In addition, QQ Group Chat allowed…

To be fair MSN Messenger went on to lose the western market as well

Re: Group chats rule the world

#104

It could be cool to have an HN Telegram group

> It could be cool to have an HN Telegram group

Then fucking do it.

I think it'd probably fail, but it might not. Importantly it allows iterations. The side group might be the winner.

My email is in my profile, I'll try for a month, add your dog, there's your group.

I think you'll find "something" already exists. There was a WhatsApp feed. For me it wasn't interesting. Do a search on the archives / Google if you care. Or just do it.

Re: Group chats rule the world

#106
post #24

https://maggieappleton.com/ai-dark-forest As AI takes over the public internet (the trees) the people will retreat to safe underground spaces where they know only authentic humans live.

It's pretty ironic that every one of their "cozy internet" site examples requires pumping all of your communications through a third-party private business that only exists if it somehow can make money off of you, and which can do whatever nebulous stuff with your data that it wants. Doesn't seem very cozy to me.

I believe the mainstream internet is already completely overrun by malicious actors, whether bots or not, and the majority of the population doesn't seem to care or have the ability to notice. I don't see the bulk of the population doing anything to retreat from it. A subset of the population, that includes myself, sure, but "the people", I doubt it.

Re: Group chats rule the world

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Sadly, can't punch people in the face over the internet. Even worse everything is all about forced inclusivity now. Nobody is going to do that anymore because we don't all have lead poisoning from gasoline fumes.

wat?

If you're old enough you might remember Americans were much more violent from 1960 to 1995 or so and the crime rate was incredibly high in American cities, leading to what was called white flight.

Now, if you work with young people (so-called zoomers), you'll notice they are absolutely not like this anymore.

At least 30% of this was caused by everyone breathing leaded gasoline.

Re: Group chats rule the world

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

wat?

If you're old enough you might remember Americans were much more violent from 1960 to 1995 or so and the crime rate was incredibly high in American cities, leading to what was called white flight. Now, if you work with young people (so-called zoomers), you'll notice they are absolutely not like this anymore. At least 30% of this was caused by everyone breathing leaded gasoline.

But lead increases your testosterone! (Look it up.)

Now, all you get is microplastics, which do the opposite.

And testosterone makes you objectively cooler and better as a person. For example, violence is cool.

Re: Group chats rule the world

#109
post #18
post #15

I remember a poll on Facebook where someone asked whether you tend to appreciate or are annoyed by being invited into group chats. Most people appreciated invitations.

In general I loathe them. I feel like they are so distracting. And then people get all spammy in groups intended to be planning groups and you have to scroll back a year to find which hotel room to book or whatever. I have Messenger notifications blocked and honestly don't know how anyone pays attention to so many and also have day jobs.

But what if you are invited into a rather exclusive group chat?

Re: Group chats rule the world

#110

> every group chat has a n-1 group containing everyone except that annoying member. And if you think your chat doesn’t have such a group, oh boy, do I have some bad news for you. There are more like 2^n - 1 subgroups, i.e. as many subgroups as the there can be. If you think you're safe because you're already part of one subgroup that complain about the people not included in this particular subgroup, I also have some…

Hahaha, that is so true and so annoying. I am perpetually scared of sending the wrong thing in the wrong group. It gets even worse if the groups have similar names. If only there was a way to filter on excluded members...
Post reply on HN