Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if the company is providing only cybersecurity-related services? Could it be in this case, that everything is on profit side.
Sure, but to the client hiring them, it's a cost. We'll take the basic compliance package please, no need for any of the gold tier high security features.
Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
191–200 of 318 posts
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do NixOS-minimal. As far as I'm aware it doesn't really add any runtime overhead in comparison to Arch, the package manager is generally quite good at figuring out which changes are going to break your system, and everything is snapshotted on every rebuild so for the most part I can be fearless. Doing a full upgrade is generally as straightforward as pointing to the latest version's repo and doing something like `s…
you still need a os. and i fail to see how nix would make video driver problem any better. the problem with running debian is that fixes are often not backported, specifically for things end users will care about, like libre office
That's actually easy to answer; video drivers can be really finicky to get working. If you screw it up, it's very easy to get into a state where you have no GUI. Nowadays I am proficient enough to work my way around the command line and I probably could fix a bad driver, but 13 years ago that wasn't really the case, and if I broke the GUI there was a risk where I'd have to nuke the machine and start from scratch. I've also had issues where updating the kernel breaks drivers, and I wasn't able to figure out how to downgrade it.
With NixOS, since adding packages and boot parameters and the like require a rebuilding of the configuration.nix, and each rebuild takes a snapshot, if something is broken all I have to do is reboot and choose a previous generation to get it into a working state, and I can debug the configuration from there.
This actually happened somewhat recently; I had a NixOS server that I was controlling via SSH that I broke the networking support for. It's kind of annoying to control a server if you can't connect to it, but all I had to do is plug in a keyboard and a portable monitor, reboot, and select a previous generation, and fix the broken change, and rebuild. The entire process took like fifteen minutes.
> the problem with running debian is that fixes are often not backported, specifically for things end users will care about, like libre office
Are there not more evergreen releases of Debian?
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#193Imagine a major bridge that was built by a contractor. A internal safety inspector repeatedly warned his supervisors of structural deficiencies that could lead to the collapse of the bridge. Furthermore, in the pass of time two external sources publicly warned about the issue, but the company downplayed the importance. Finally, the bridge collapses. It becomes evident that the company did nothing about the issue beca…
Boeing in a nutshell. >What is different in our industry that companies (and managers) get away with such malice? Software isn't immediately life threatening. That's why it's all thr wild west outside of medical and aerospace. While it sucks to have PI leaked to the internet, you do have time to at least take action compared to a door in an airplane coming off.
being a boeing whistleblower is though
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably neither, "don't do bribes" training is standard onboarding procedure at any Fortune 500 company. Just ironic timing from OPs POV
Not just onboarding. Most, if not all, large companies waste at least an hour of their employees time on this per year, while themselves bribing politicians in DC.
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#195Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#196Imagine a major bridge that was built by a contractor. A internal safety inspector repeatedly warned his supervisors of structural deficiencies that could lead to the collapse of the bridge. Furthermore, in the pass of time two external sources publicly warned about the issue, but the company downplayed the importance. Finally, the bridge collapses. It becomes evident that the company did nothing about the issue beca…
So software developers should be criminally liable for introducing security bugs?
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#197The misaligned incentives between security and profit, especially in public companies, is not really a fixable problem without a massive cultural shift. I'm not sure at this point what could even trigger one. I've always dabbled in cybersecurity, taking on the hat in various roles over the years but have refused to go full time into it due to what I have personally seen in the industry - an overwhelming focus on comp…
OTOH, a few SCAP baselines I've seen contain good shit.
Standardization and change control with deep, vigilant internal and external review help because infosec is a cross-cutting concern requiring holistic, defense-in-depth controls, checks, and application. Also, avoid a Tragedy of the Commons scenario originating from an attitude of "it's everyone's responsibility" by having a dedicated security team with the resources, authority, and accountability to pushback against unsafe practices, and monitoring and remediating problems.
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#198The misaligned incentives between security and profit, especially in public companies, is not really a fixable problem without a massive cultural shift. I'm not sure at this point what could even trigger one. I've always dabbled in cybersecurity, taking on the hat in various roles over the years but have refused to go full time into it due to what I have personally seen in the industry - an overwhelming focus on comp…
This is exactly it. There is no incentive to prioritise security. It is not visible to customers, except in terms of compliance, most likely a check-list approach. I think it needs a massive cultural shift, but from customers. If customers were willing to evaluate security (consumers cannot, but enterprise can) properly, demand binding assurances, and make buying choices accordingly industry would respond. Of course…
The problem is more reactive environments take a Russian Roulette gamble on potentially unrecoverable catastrophes before taking action.
(Proactivity is more expensive than clicking a seatbelt.)
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
I dunno, that’s a pretty cynical take. Isn’t it just as plausible that they became aware of the bribes internally and were trying to curtail them when the scandal broke out? Or maybe the “don’t do bribes” training actually worked enough for someone to whistleblow even if official internal channels failed? Those who are doing wrong often try to stymie others from making positive changes out of fear, greed, etc. Edit:…
> dunno, that’s a pretty cynical take Just days ago a major US corporation was found guilty of hiring Death Squads in Columbia. Literally to murder people. Why do we have this common illusions that corporation will not steep down to the dirtiest crimes they can get away with? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6pprpd3x96o
Re: Microsoft Chose Profit over Security, Whistleblower Says
#200> “If you’re faced with the tradeoff between security and another priority, your answer is clear: Do security,” the company’s CEO, Satya Nadella, told employees. Satya's model of making security a priority at Microsoft: - Cram ads in every nook and corner of Windows. Left, right, centre, back, front, everywhere. What else is an operating system for? - Install a recorder which records everything you do. For the benefi…