Live data from Hacker News

The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

blog.archive.org

51–60 of 117 posts

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#51
post #21

How did people hunting for the origin of this image discover the random niche website preserved by the Internet Archive that this image happened to come from?

Up until last month, the earliest known post/repost of the Backrooms image was an archived 4chan post from 2018, but it was believed to have been taken in 2012 or earlier based on the filename. So people have been looking for earlier posts/reposts of the image for years in an effort to uncover its origin. During the recent successful search, the searchers trawled 4chan archives for early-2010s posts with similar imag…

this poor guy keeps getting ignored. here is the tweet https://x.com/rkfg_me/status/1130028610700664832

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#52
post #21

How did people hunting for the origin of this image discover the random niche website preserved by the Internet Archive that this image happened to come from?

Up until last month, the earliest known post/repost of the Backrooms image was an archived 4chan post from 2018, but it was believed to have been taken in 2012 or earlier based on the filename. So people have been looking for earlier posts/reposts of the image for years in an effort to uncover its origin. During the recent successful search, the searchers trawled 4chan archives for early-2010s posts with similar imag…

Wait so, the Internet Archive was not involved at all in finding the original, but since the image exists in the archive, IA have written a blog post claiming to be crucial to its discovery? Seems like taking credit for something they didn't do to be honest. They didn't even mention the Tweet in the blog post which was essential to finding the image, which makes me think they want that part overlooked.

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#54
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The original URL of the photo was actually found on Twitter, where it had been posted in 2011. Wayback Machine was used only for the final confirmation. It's curious that this is not mentioned in the article, but I suppose it ruins the narrative. I read about the whole thing last week at 404media, via waxy blog, which is a much more comprehensive article: https://archive.is/sj846

That is actually kinda fascinating given that it's directly in opposition to this blog post. I wonder who's telling the truth?

The people who found it are telling the truth. The trail of discovery was 4chan then Twitter then Wayback Machine.

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Up until last month, the earliest known post/repost of the Backrooms image was an archived 4chan post from 2018, but it was believed to have been taken in 2012 or earlier based on the filename. So people have been looking for earlier posts/reposts of the image for years in an effort to uncover its origin. During the recent successful search, the searchers trawled 4chan archives for early-2010s posts with similar imag…

Wait so, the Internet Archive was not involved at all in finding the original, but since the image exists in the archive, IA have written a blog post claiming to be crucial to its discovery? Seems like taking credit for something they didn't do to be honest. They didn't even mention the Tweet in the blog post which was essential to finding the image, which makes me think they want that part overlooked.

I think it's part of the recent trend to not mention Twitter/X because of its owner.

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#56

See you all in the backrooms

Anyway, I'm sorry if some people are reading this hastily written blog entry to seem like the archive is taking credit for the process of discovery being done by people. The phrase likely does not mean definitely and perhaps I should have used a different word when I wrote the entry. But the fact remains that the wayback machine is the only place you can see the image in the context of its original website, and that…

Thanks for writing the blogpost! I think it's perfectly valid as a fun demonstration of the utility of the wayback machine.

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#57
“ However the original, anonymous user stumbled onto this photograph, it appears it was taken from either the Wayback directly, or the Wayback Machine crawled the same site the user had found, and kept that webpage’s preservation for over 20 years.”

Something people used to do is to use search engines to find images with file names that indicate they were from a digital camera. You could find all sorts of interesting photos that people had uploaded to share with their friends not realising that search engines would index them.

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#58
post #36

Gotta love the found footage videos' photorealism and camera effects too. One of the reasons why a "retro" motif is commonly seen in these videos is to make it more convincing. What found footage video do you assume to be most convincing? And how do you think photorealistic found footage videos will be made in the future?

everyone says the Kanepixels stuff is the best, but in my opinion, establishing a lore and a story with this big corporate overlord and science fiction stuff was a mistake and only erodes the mysterious and malevolent nature of the entire thing.

There's a youtube account called "mattstudios" who does his own take, and generally spearheaded the "poolrooms" variant of this genre, that is far more grounded and tries to present the concept from the point of view of an everyday guy who "noclips" into it purely by mistake.

for me, this is the best backrooms take, not just for how realistic the video artifacts are, but because of how it captures just a guy recording something on his handicam in 1997 and how he'd realistically act: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KenTOGFwLpU

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#59
post #38
post #5

I didn't know about the old meme, but the image made me immediately think of The Stanley Parable. Not surprising since TSP is probably a descendant of the meme.

I'm surprised that despite all the talk about liminal spaces, no one mentions the lack of windows in those spaces and how much they add to the creepyness. I found this especially noticeable in Stanley Parable. Or rather, the offices there have windows, but they are all opaque, showing just a featureless white (and a few are mounted on interior walls, making you doubt whether they really are windows or just LED panels…

I've been fascinated by the genre of creepy "liminal space" pictures for ages because the universal nature of how offputting they are seems to transcend a lot of cultural barriers

I think that it actually boils down to a very deep seeded similar animalistic fear all of us have: the agoraphobic open spaces with no place to hide, lack of furniture or shelving to hide behind either, unreliable lighting with stark shadows that could hide danger, no windows or inability to judge the passage of time or ostensibly escape through. They're always desolate with no people around, and what's more, evidence that nobody's been through in ages so you can't even hope to stumble upon anyone. Abandoned places, dangerous decrepit old buildings, places too large to count on passing by another person, places abandoned at night because people have left.

In the end, you feel trapped like a rat in a shoebox with nowhere to go. If something trying to get you appeared, you'd have no options to run or fight back, and nobody to call out to for help.

one of my favourite series of images were of an american suburb, rows of identical houses with fences, far apart from each other so interaction with neighbours was minimal, short little trees, so everything is exposed. Because the construction was so new, nobody had moved in yet, so there were no cars, no lit up windows, absolutely no life. In lieu of walls keeping you trapped, the sheer size was the isolating factor: you could run away for 10 minutes and get nowhere.

Re: The Backrooms of the Internet Archive

#60

“ However the original, anonymous user stumbled onto this photograph, it appears it was taken from either the Wayback directly, or the Wayback Machine crawled the same site the user had found, and kept that webpage’s preservation for over 20 years.” Something people used to do is to use search engines to find images with file names that indicate they were from a digital camera. You could find all sorts of interesting…

I recall a thread years and years ago about a guy who found an abandoned digital camera in the woods, only to take it home and extract the photos from its SD card, and as everyone poured over them, they began noticing odd figures in the trees and so on.

That's the kind of fun group activity I love about these mysterious things

Post reply on HN