Earlier quoted context omitted.
Plus, you should never answer security questions honestly. Your favorite pet or the street you grew up on or your mother's maiden name are all not secret information. Many of my friends and family know the answers to all of these. So, when faced with a security question, I try to pick a random (but false) security answer, which I then write down in an encrypted file. This is a terrible solution, but it feels foolish…
Security questions are usually just used to decide whether to send you an email with a password reset link (or more annoyingly, a new password), aren't they? I've never seen a system where being able to answer the security question(s) is equivalent to knowing your password. Anyone who knows my mother's maiden name probably also knows my email address and could more easily spam me directly than using a website to send…
Password Rules
81–90 of 157 posts
Re: Password Rules
#82If you had to create a list(or non-list) of requirements a password must pass what would it be? (Ex. Case sensitivity, length, cannot be the same as username etc etc) The bare minimum with the least frustration for the user? I was very surprised by the news-piece that blizzard was using case-insensitive passwords and that got me thinking...
That is a trade-of because they will write it down and put it next to their monitor.
But then the bad guy has to physically get it and the password isn't going to be used anywhere else so you nuke the two biggest issues with passwords.
Re: Password Rules
#83Everyone's making fun of this, and it is dumb. But really this is just an example about how passwords are a stupid form of authentication. Not just this site, all passworded sites. We really need something better. I favor OpenID or something like it. Single strong form of authentication, delegate login authority from that to non-critical sites like Hacker News. OpenID has enough of a bad reputation now it's probably…
I don't know that passwords are all bad. For an alternative approach to complex rules, see: http://xkcd.com/936/ The last time I changed a password for a service I set it to a phrase that I can easily remember but which no human or current machine will easily guess. I'd say that the only good rule is "Make it at least 9 characters" (which is at least long enough to disallow "password").
Unfortunately, many sites enforce rules that preclude this password style (e.g., must contain a number).
Re: Password Rules
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ashamed to admit but I used to "hack" my classmates (girls) hotmail accounts like that when I was young. I tried to recover their password and if I didn't know the answer to their security question (I often did) I just asked... I was curious if they write something about me in their emails, never did...
Simply brilliant. You should submit this together with a security issue report to Facebook and Hotmail and whoever else uses security questions. Do you mind if I quote you (with link) on my blog?
Google, too. I suggest you run through the recovery process yourself (on a dummy account, or your own) to see the kinds of questions asked. Questions like "when did you last access the account?" are easily answered; as is "name 5 regular contacts"; and so on. I could (but would not) perform the recovery process (and gain access to) acquaintances accounts, given how simple the questions are.
The key is just knowing "enough" in aggregate to pass their bar.
Re: Password Rules
#85I swear one day we will see. "Unfortunately time and again we have come to observe the inability of employees to follow simple rules during password creation. For example, despite our warnings, employees often create a password containing more than one consecutive non-numeral; other employees attempt to createa a password consisting only of numbers, only of letters, or an insecure mix of numbers and letters - e.g. 5:…
> The password must be exactly 8 characters long. This is probably the root cause of bad passwords. In the case of Average Joe, he is now having to choose something memorable which is 8 characters long. 'PassworD'
Re: Password Rules
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Simply brilliant. You should submit this together with a security issue report to Facebook and Hotmail and whoever else uses security questions. Do you mind if I quote you (with link) on my blog?
Go ahead... hotmail by the way still let's you take over someones account by only knowing email address and answer to security question which is often maiden middle name, name of first pet, best childhood friend etc... you can find that information freely from facebook for an example. Or just ask :)
Re: Password Rules
#87Also: quit the "security questions" thing. I can't count the number of times I've been locked out of my account because I couldn't remember the precise answer I gave to a security question. I bought a house last month, and the biggest thorn in my side throughout all of the financial arrangements was security questions (I'm not even joking). Here's a Facebook status update I posted (I had already been complaining abou…
Re: Password Rules
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The password must be exactly 8 characters long. This is probably the root cause of bad passwords. In the case of Average Joe, he is now having to choose something memorable which is 8 characters long. 'PassworD'
Sorry, "PassworD" doesn't validate. You're missing a symbol, and you have a character repeated. Try "P@s5w0rd" instead. Or, better yet, "abc#1234" as suggested in the examples.
Re: Password Rules
#89Re: Password Rules
#90Also: quit the "security questions" thing. I can't count the number of times I've been locked out of my account because I couldn't remember the precise answer I gave to a security question. I bought a house last month, and the biggest thorn in my side throughout all of the financial arrangements was security questions (I'm not even joking). Here's a Facebook status update I posted (I had already been complaining abou…