Live data from Hacker News

Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

thedrive.com

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#22
post #20
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that a good thing to have a very heavy car ?

Bigger and heavier cars are more expensive, thus they are worth more and they must be better.

Ok, I get it, there is more metal, so the scrap value is higher. Makes sense.

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#24
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not how these calculations work at all. Weight (if it doesn't change the size or shape) really only has an effect on rolling resistance, which is a small portion of overall losses. The extra weight should make a marginal difference in efficiency. Just expect more tire wear.

Newton's laws of motion would like to have a talk with you about those statements. A heavier vehicle absolutely needs more energy than a lighter one when all other factors stay the same.

The majority of energy expenditure is not acceleration and deceleration (especially on an EV with regen braking). At moderate and high speeds wind resistance dominates. At slower speeds rolling resistance is a largish factor.

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#25

Comparison on efficiency is silly. People don’t buy full ton trucks with duallies because they get better gas mileage.

Not when range is a concern -- efficiency directly speaks to range, and it's towing range which is the primary weakness of EV trucks. If you just wanted to haul heavy loads in the bed, I wouldn't necessarily think that an F-150 Lightning or Cyber Truck are all that inferior. (just too expensive)

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#26
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not how these calculations work at all. Weight (if it doesn't change the size or shape) really only has an effect on rolling resistance, which is a small portion of overall losses. The extra weight should make a marginal difference in efficiency. Just expect more tire wear.

Newton's laws of motion would like to have a talk with you about those statements. A heavier vehicle absolutely needs more energy than a lighter one when all other factors stay the same.

And what does Newton say about regenerative braking? Does the energy you put into the system just go puff?

I hate when people make smart-ass claims with surface level knowledge at best.

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#27
post #14
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "truck" weighs around 20% more ( CT @ 6,000 lbs vs X @ 5000 lbs), so the larger battery pack effect is nullified and cancels out.

That's not how these calculations work at all. Weight (if it doesn't change the size or shape) really only has an effect on rolling resistance, which is a small portion of overall losses. The extra weight should make a marginal difference in efficiency. Just expect more tire wear.

There’s a 600ft climb involved too. It’s not an enormous difference, but lifting that extra 1200lbs still adds up to about 0.3 kWh.

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#28

Comparison on efficiency is silly. People don’t buy full ton trucks with duallies because they get better gas mileage.

Yeah, they do. When towing a couple horses across state lines I don’t want to subject those poor animals to stopping every 90-100 miles for an hour to charge. I don’t even want to subject myself to that.

Re: Tesla Cybertruck Loses to Model X in Towing Range Test – Again

#30

What's the range of a Model X towing 10,000lbs? A mile before you break something? A Prius might have massively more towing range than an F-350, assuming you're towing a tiny trailer.

0 km, its twice the best tow rating of a model X and you'd likely lose your warranty if you tried to tow something that heavy.
Post reply on HN