Live data from Hacker News

Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

twitter.com

341–350 of 899 posts

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#341

Despite Elon's recent turn into divisive politics, I am still very happy he is pushing spacex development forward. I love watching these livestreams, and always look forward to Scott Manley's analysis a day or two later.

Looks like Scott Manley has been working hard and was able to release his video very quickly:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m0TY6i1Kuo

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#342
post #263

Seeing Live HD video of the outside of the ship on reentry is just incredible. Here's a link to the timestamp: https://youtu.be/8VESowgMbjA?t=35093

Wow I actually got served the Elon crypto deepfake scam as an ad on that video.

Elon crypto deepfake scam is the new rick-roll

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#344
post #3

The rate of descent is absolutely astonishing, 8km -> 1km in 20 seconds, then just hovers above the water. Absolutely incredible work by the SpaceX team. Living in central Florida I cannot wait for the new launch facility to come online. We're going to have lines of spectators into the space coast like we did for the shuttle. If any of you are heading to Disney World you should stop by the NASA Kennedy Visitor Comple…

The 'worst' thing about watching space launches on streams is that you simply cannot grasp how ridiculously huge these things are. Even if, like in the stream today, you see a water tower for some scale, the size discrepancies just make it so hard to intuit. Starship is 121 meters high. That's something taller than a football field, jetting off into space! I've only gotten to see a decommissioned Space Shuttle in person, but that was also amazing. Even its fuel tank [1] makes you feel just tiny, yet it's merely 47m. Getting to see Starship live would be such an amazing opportunity.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_external_tank

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#345
post #307

Seeing the Starship's flap visibly burning in the reentry heat and still survive well enough to move around and get to a splashdown was just incredible. Amazing progress in just four test flights.

Also lost an engine at startup and another engine during the landing burn on the booster. Judging by the debris maybe a third engine during landing burn shutdown (or maybe that was the second engine just exploding a bit more). Still a successful test, still a lot of work to do before they can meet their promises for Artemis (which require >10 back to back launches for one lunar mission...)

True. Heard SpaceX commentator today saying they plan 4 launch towers in near term. Hopefully the major issues that lead to FAA investigations are resolved and the cadence can ramp up. Probably won't be long before Starship's launch as often as Falcon 9s today.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#346

Some highlights: Booster splashdown at about T+7:30, Ship engine cutoff at 151 km: https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1798700946983358535 Starship splashdown in Indian Ocean, mostly intact, with landing burn just before splashdown; landing burn: https://x.com/DJSnM/status/1798715665916014715 Full flight profile: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship_integrated_fli...

How do they recover the booster? It doesn't sink to the bottom of the sea?

They are not recovering it this time. Once they demonstrate that it can achieve a controlled "landing" at sea, then they will move on to trying to land it back at the launch site.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That flap is already a legend, kept at it even mangled by hot plasma, crazy accelerations and pressures, spitting molten steel at the camera. What a role model, the little flap that could.

Someone on the Everyday Astronaut live stream named it "Flap Norris".

[deleted]

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#348
For some reason the main hacker news article keeps getting deleted and merged with this one. The link should be changed to: https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1798715759193096245

Also the title is wrong for the subject. It should be about Starship, not Super Heavy. I don't know who did this but you did it wrong.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That flap is already a legend, kept at it even mangled by hot plasma, crazy accelerations and pressures, spitting molten steel at the camera. What a role model, the little flap that could.

Someone on the Everyday Astronaut live stream named it "Flap Norris".

I wonder what the odds are that some deep sea salvage group is moving to collect that this very instant (or being contracted for such). If Starship lives up to even a fraction of its potential, that [not so] little guy is going to have some serious historicity.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#350

Booster executed a successful landing burn and had a soft splashdown. Starship survived reentry, did the flip and landing burn, and splashed down. There was visible damage to the flaps.

How do they recover the booster? After the soft splashdown isn't it going to sink to the bottom of the sea? Or they have nets or something?

They don't right now, because they are still testing. They can't risk bringing the booster or the ship back over land, because they don't know yet how well and precise they can steer and maneuver them. When they've figured that out, we will see the first landing of a super heavy booster for recovery and that will be pretty spectacular I bet …
Post reply on HN