Live data from Hacker News

Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

twitter.com

121–130 of 899 posts

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#121

Holy shit, that was incredible. One of the fins burned half away and still managed to control for a soft splashdown. https://imgur.com/a/zNXUjbt

The other external view we got was mounted on one of the other flaps, and we didn't get footage from it even after the camera we did get was obscured. So some amount of damage/overheating on multiple fins is likely.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#122
post #66
post #52

So I'm excited to see this tech develop but I wonder how much of a market there really is for super-heavy lifters. I can't wait to see a future version where they land the various stages rather than just dumping them into the sea. The first Falcon Heavy launch was super impressive. SpaceX already has the Falcon Heavy and there have only been a handful of launches, primarily military. I guess the argument is it'll ope…

Eventually it will get cheap enough to where people can be buried on the (shot at the) moon.

Talked about this with my partner this week. Somebody is going to yeet their ashes into the regolith some day.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#123
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Getting things done and being a shitty human being aren’t mutually exclusive.

One of the humans who did the most for humankind. Being called names. Shame.

George Washington did a lot of important good, while being a slaveowner.

Galileo was notorious for being a douche.

The world is complex. I'm a huge SpaceX fan, and a big critic of Musk's handling of Twitter. It's OK to hold these opinions simultaneously.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#124
post #110

Here is a reminder that the only other rocket that can survive re-entry is Falcon 9. Now we have the 2nd!

Falcon 9 cannot survive re-entry. The first stage doesn’t reach orbit and the second is expended. The Dragon capsule can survive re-entry but that’s not unique among spacecraft.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#125
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly wondering if that's a Stage 0 issue: those outer engines get primed by the launch ring AFAIK.

Yep, the outer ring is non-relightable and rely on the launch ring to light them. That said, part of the benefit of having so many engines is that you can tolerate a couple of failures. Similarly to how F9 is able to make orbit with an engine out. Still, agreed that they'll probably opt for one more water landing test first. Especially since the current license allows for multiple launches of this profile if the boos…

I think the number is 3 so losing one immediately isn't great. They're much more reliable though than that first launch where so many failed.

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#126
post #94
post #68

What the hell, half melted starship actually did the landing flip and hit the ocean slow!!! That was amazing!

That was seriously some of the most dramatic television I've ever watched. Video of Starship being melted/torn apart by supersonic plasma, the broadcast stream dying multiple times maybe due to ship destruction, then finally back online, peeking through the cracked camera to see the nearly destroyed grid fin STILL ACTUATING. The announcers laughing about the ship being "maybe held together by some nuts and bolts" and…

You can tell the ship still exists because the telemetry still updates

Re: Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

#127

Watching pieces of the ship melt off, but then seeing it make a relatively controlled landing, is perversely confidence building. If it can survive that kind of damage on a control surface maybe it's a quite robust craft.

Agree, a successful mission needn't be a perfect mission
Post reply on HN