Live data from Hacker News

I am sick of LeetCode-style interviews

nelson.cloud

1–10 of 625 posts

Re: I am sick of LeetCode-style interviews

#3
If I am interviewing someone and if they ask me if they can google X, if it is easily googlable, I would just tell them what it is. Or let them google it. But I do not expect them to spend minutes googling it.

It is really unlikely, given a leetcode hard level problem to solve within 25-35 minutes and you can google your way out of it unless you are googling for the solution.

Re: I am sick of LeetCode-style interviews

#5
Isn't the entire point of memoizing this to demonstrate you are able to study/grind rather than prove intelligence? Different companies/managers have give me different reasons for the usage of this style of interview but it was usually to 'assess ability to get through rough stuff' and 'assess cognitive abilities'.

Idk anymore either and I refuse to conduct these interviews. I generally prefer somewhat realistic problems that are multi-disciplenary but have ties to real world applications related to the role.

Re: I am sick of LeetCode-style interviews

#6
Leetcode style interviews probably serve two functions:

1) A way to suppress wages and job mobility for SWE. Who wants to switch jobs when it means studying for a month or two? Also, if you get unlucky and some try hard drops an atomic LC hard bomb on you now you have an entire company you can no longer apply to for a year.

2) A way to mask bias in the process while claiming that it’s a fair process because everyone has a clear/similar objective.

Meet someone who went to your Alma mater? Same gender? Same race? Give them the same question as everyone else, but hint them through it, ignore some syntax errors, and give them a strong hire for “communication” when they didn’t even implement the optimal approach…

Or is it someone you don’t like for X reason? Drop a leetcode hard on them and send them packing and just remain silent the entire interview.

To the company this is acceptable noise, but to the individual, this is costing us 100s of thousands of dollars, because there’s only a handful of companies that pay well and they all have the same interview process. Failing 3 interviews probably means you’re now out $200-300k of additional compensation from the top paying companies.

I’ve interviewed for and at FAANGs. I can’t believe the low bar of people that we’ve hired, while simultaneously seeing insane ridiculous quad tree/number theory type questions that have caused other great engineers to miss out on good opportunities.

Someone will reply to me “if you know how to problem solve you will always pass.” Ok, come interview with me and I will ask you verbatim one of those quad tree/number theory/inclusion exclusion principle questions and I’d love to see you squirm, meanwhile another candidate is asked a basic hash map question.

Post reply on HN