I'm slightly more sympathetic having heard their side--there is more to it than just random legal threats out of the blue. ..BUT.. This suit revolves more around "we felt wronged" than "this clearly infringes our trademark." The only similarity in the trademark is the word "who." The law is the law, your feelings are irrelevant.
WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
21–30 of 145 posts
Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#22We literally bet our life savings on this and years of zero vacations to bring WhosHere to where it is. Making a bad business decision and living a shitty life doesn't entitle you to sue people who make a similar app just because their app's name uses some of the same letters as your app's name. (Both companies picked crappy names that are poor brands and poor trademarks. It's like calling your hamburger shop "Hambur…
Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#23Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#24Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#25We literally bet our life savings on this and years of zero vacations to bring WhosHere to where it is. Making a bad business decision and living a shitty life doesn't entitle you to sue people who make a similar app just because their app's name uses some of the same letters as your app's name. (Both companies picked crappy names that are poor brands and poor trademarks. It's like calling your hamburger shop "Hambur…
In general, if you have a trademark and do not defend it, your lack of defending can be used against you later.
Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#26apparently according to Brian he has an obscene trust fund, so why didnt he lawyer up. Perhpas the mileage HN could bring + bad press he can bring about to a competitor was more enticing? https://whoshere.zendesk.com/attachments/token/v4qbuvns0xkik...
For example, Brian's opening salvo "Neither of these options are remotely acceptable to me. It is also offensive to me that you would think my time was only worth $100/hr, considering I turn down requests offering 4 times that rate regularly."
Seriously, "regularly" turning down offers for work at a rate of over $400/hr?
And also, "I was born wealthy; I have an obscene trust fund. I assure you that if required, I will obtain the best legal representation for corporate litigation in the Silicon Valley."
When I read the original blog post, it really tugs on the heart strings and makes Brian seem the underdog.
Now after reading these emails, he comes across as a complete jackass.
Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#27Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#28And I don't understand how they are stealing his work. They just asked for a name change. Then they offered to buy him out and share revenue.
Why wouldn't he just change the name?
Am I missing something?
Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#29We literally bet our life savings on this and years of zero vacations to bring WhosHere to where it is. Making a bad business decision and living a shitty life doesn't entitle you to sue people who make a similar app just because their app's name uses some of the same letters as your app's name. (Both companies picked crappy names that are poor brands and poor trademarks. It's like calling your hamburger shop "Hambur…
In general, if you have a trademark and do not defend it, your lack of defending can be used against you later.
Re: WhosHere's response to Brian Hamachek/Who's Near Me
#30We literally bet our life savings on this and years of zero vacations to bring WhosHere to where it is. Making a bad business decision and living a shitty life doesn't entitle you to sue people who make a similar app just because their app's name uses some of the same letters as your app's name. (Both companies picked crappy names that are poor brands and poor trademarks. It's like calling your hamburger shop "Hambur…
In general, if you have a trademark and do not defend it, your lack of defending can be used against you later.
(I could be wrong about the details, since the court docs are not loading for me. I will edit the "parts in quotes" about the two options if I am way off base.)