Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#2previous post of llama3v on hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40504827
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#3Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#4Is there a nice outoftheloop summary out there somewhere?
I don't follow these projects closely. =/
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#5Related https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1d6f1f3/llama3v... https://aksh-garg.medium.com/llama-3v-building-an-open-sourc...
> Edit (June 2)
> A big thank you to people who pointed out similarities to previous research in the comments. We realized that our architecture is very similar to OpenBMB’s “MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5: A GPT-4V Level Multimodal LLM on Your Phone,” who beat us to the implementation. We have taken down our original model in respect to the authors.
> The link to the original author’s repository can be found here: https://github.com/OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V/tree/main?tab=readme-ov...
> — Aksh Garg, Sid Sharma
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#6Related (Chinese)
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#7Is there a nice outoftheloop summary out there somewhere? I don't follow these projects closely. =/
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#8Is there a nice outoftheloop summary out there somewhere? I don't follow these projects closely. =/
Related https://github.com/OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V/issues/196
Oh okay, so these are two different academic projects.
> If the research team from Stanford University is proven to have plagiarized this MiniCPM-V project from Tsinghua University, they should feel ashamed, and also, MiniCPM-V project deserve an apology and acknowledgment.
I was thinking this might have been a commercial organization stealing from an open source project or something.
> This is the strongest evidence that llama3-V does not train its model at all, but adds random Gaussian noise to the model parameters of miniCPM-llama3-v2.5
And not just "built on without attribution", but a literal copy between the products with minimal changes.
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#9[flagged]
Re: Llama3V is suspected to have been stolen from the MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5 project
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Related https://github.com/OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V/issues/196
Oh okay, so these are two different academic projects. > If the research team from Stanford University is proven to have plagiarized this MiniCPM-V project from Tsinghua University, they should feel ashamed, and also, MiniCPM-V project deserve an apology and acknowledgment. I was thinking this might have been a commercial organization stealing from an open source project or something. > This is the strongest evidence…
[flagged]