Who's their biggest enemy at the moment
The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
21–30 of 227 posts
Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#22Why, what's the point in doing such nonsense? Unless it's someone with lots of money, contacts in the dark web, and some historic Barbara Streisand type chip on the shoulder.
Maybe it's a form of advertising certain capabilities and services.
For the sake of argument (maybe not true), let's say that all techies are aware of archive.org, and consider it beneficial, probably using it themselves.
Why don't they instead demo against a target that will be proof of capability, and one that someone won't pay them to do (no freebies), yet one that they perceive as bad or deserving in some way?
Probably improper to suggest "better" targets here, but I really wonder what's going on when some relative do-gooder gets attacked.
Similarly, ransomware attack on a children's hospital, of all places? Doesn't that get you uninvited to criminal mastermind dinner parties?
As Omar of "The Wire" told us, a man's gotta have a code.
Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#23This is like an arsonist lighting an orphanage or library on fire. Why would you do something like that?
Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#24Why, what's the point in doing such nonsense? Unless it's someone with lots of money, contacts in the dark web, and some historic Barbara Streisand type chip on the shoulder.
So in other words, anybody can carry out a DDOS for basically no cost. So trying to analyze the purpose, let alone suspects, is probably not going to be fruitful.
Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#25Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#26Cui bono?
Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#27Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#28Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#29Re: The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe there is something damning on there that someone needs kept quiet for a while?
No.