Live data from Hacker News

Why did Tom Lehrer swap fame for obscurity?

theguardian.com

11–20 of 167 posts

Re: Why did Tom Lehrer swap fame for obscurity?

#11
post #4

“Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.” Truer words have never been sung.

Those words haven't (so far as I know) been sung either: they're from one of his spoken preambles, not from any of the songs.

(The preambles are generally at least as funny as the songs, at least in my estimation.)

Re: Why did Tom Lehrer swap fame for obscurity?

#13
I can’t pretend to know the man’s mind but I always got the vibe he didn’t really feel at home in the cultural landscape of the late 60s and onwards

Personally I think his contributions would be welcome in any era, and either way “this is the year that was” is a certified banger

Re: Why did Tom Lehrer swap fame for obscurity?

#15
post #9

I saw "Tomfoolery," a Lehrer revue, in 1980 or 1981 in SF. The actor singing "The Elements" had a periodic table and a pointer. He identified every element in time and at tempo without missing a one. Impressive.

Daniel Radcliffe sang it on Graham Norton, introducing Tom Lehrer to a crowd who didn't know him. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rSAaiYKF0cs

When I saw that video back then my jaw dropped.Was fascinated by it

Re: Why did Tom Lehrer swap fame for obscurity?

#17
I still have some Tom Lehrer songs in my playlist. They sound like they're a product of their time but are still relevant today.

I am also amused that I learned "new math" in elementary school, but I think it's actually different from the "new math" in his song of that name. I didn't hate it, honestly. "Now the book wants you to do it in base 8." This is actually relevant to my day to day work. (Though in base 8, I have to say that I only ever use bitmasks. chmod 755 foobar)

Post reply on HN