Live data from Hacker News

Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

gizmodo.com

111–120 of 129 posts

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#111
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not? The rich, the police and government track our every movement, word and deed through our technology. Why shouldn't we be able to track them back? If we can't dismantle the pantopticon let's at least make it equitable. Everyone suffers.

Taylor’s not tracking you

I have no way to know that unless I have direct access to her itinerary and flight plans. It's just a matter of public safety. If she has nothing to hide, she has nothing to fear.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#112
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you remember the "code review" debacle after Elon took over Twitter? Of course HN thought it was genius[0] but outside of the Elon hugbox the premise of being told to print out the last 30 days of code you wrote to justify your job is absurd and clueless. It's the sort of thing someone who's trying too hard to appear clever would do. Do you really think Elon is like that with Twitter - not just an idiot on it but…

Don't forget the story said an assistant wrote the memo. It's very possible Musk said "print" in the programmer sense - like "print to console" - and the assistant misunderstood.

That doesn't seem likely given his ego and personality and apparent tendency to micromanage.

The problem is the premise that one can effectively decide the value of an employee's work by counting LOC or reading their output in that manner at all. It's dumb whether it's done with a REPL or a stack of paper.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#113
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He has a degree in physics and one in economics, both from Penn.

What does a degree in physics or economics have to do with brainchips?

You're kidding, right?

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#114
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Going to church which is usually local doesn't compare to the entertainment industry's waste from touring, production nevermind the collective gas usage. We shouldn't be promoting emotional effects that are massed produced like facebook feeds that trigger real emotional responses to fake simulants

I think churches were a lot like spoken word venues with performers who try to copy the best, occasional traveling stars, and the most usable advice being memes that predate Christianity.

There are no performers. At it's basic level it's people getting together in a home where they read a bit of a book. More like a book club.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#115
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't forget the story said an assistant wrote the memo. It's very possible Musk said "print" in the programmer sense - like "print to console" - and the assistant misunderstood.

That doesn't seem likely given his ego and personality and apparent tendency to micromanage. The problem is the premise that one can effectively decide the value of an employee's work by counting LOC or reading their output in that manner at all. It's dumb whether it's done with a REPL or a stack of paper.

You can find the lowest performers in an org pretty easily through a combination of reviewing what they’ve gotten done the last year (via self reviews, manager reviews, a recap writeup etc) and looking at their commit history and docs or other artifacts created.

High performers challenge this notion because they say “I have very difficult bug fixes that required little code.” But high performing engineers just don’t realize how little (shockingly little) output actually comes out of low performers. Like, a slow trickle of trivial code, and tasks that stretch for weeks for no good reason besides their inability to overcome obstacles

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#116
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That doesn't seem likely given his ego and personality and apparent tendency to micromanage. The problem is the premise that one can effectively decide the value of an employee's work by counting LOC or reading their output in that manner at all. It's dumb whether it's done with a REPL or a stack of paper.

You can find the lowest performers in an org pretty easily through a combination of reviewing what they’ve gotten done the last year (via self reviews, manager reviews, a recap writeup etc) and looking at their commit history and docs or other artifacts created. High performers challenge this notion because they say “I have very difficult bug fixes that required little code.” But high performing engineers just don’t…

>You can find the lowest performers in an org pretty easily through a combination of reviewing what they’ve gotten done the last year (via self reviews, manager reviews, a recap writeup etc) and looking at their commit history and docs or other artifacts created.

Yes but that isn't what happened. By all accounts no such process took place at Twitter.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#117
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>but also smarter Smarter? Have you seen his Twitter timeline? He falls for nearly every fake news and conspiracy theory. We aren't threatened by Dave Grohl because he doesn't use his social media outreach to promote right wing conspiracy BS.

Yeah he’s an idiot on twitter. But he’s still smarter than both of us. Or I guess I shouldn’t include you in that, in case your day job happens to involve conducting high-level business and engineering reviews of manned spacecraft like Elon does.

What's that stupid vacuum train idea he was shilling? It was obviously dumb.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#120
post #63

Anonymizing aircraft registration was, for the most part, already possible. I first figured this out when I started playing with ADSB reception many years ago before it became the trivial effort it is today. The first plane that I happened to receive just happened to be a learjet registered to "Bank of Utah" or something similarly obtuse. It took all of about 30 seconds to figure out this was Steve Jobs' plane; it ha…

This isn't to do with aircraft registration: it's to do with the fixed airframe identifier in the Mode-S data. By default, a single airframe (plane) will also squawk the same identifier on Mode-S, which can be picked up by passive receivers owned by the general public.
Post reply on HN