DDG relying on bing for doing searches is... strange to me. I feel like I've seen its own web crawler in my access logs
Most alternative search engines are backed by either Google or Bing. Some have their own indexes as well, but it's rare to see a fully independent search engine.
DuckDuckGo was down
201–210 of 571 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#202Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#203Huh, of all those, ddg seems the odd one. I thought it used its own search service, didn't realise it was bing underneath. Even if that's not entirely true the fact that the home page is down due to the same reason that bing is down doesn't look good.
Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#204Maybe this forces DDG and ChatGPT to make their own search engine index and corpus. Sure it might be a few years too late for the former, but thats probably what they said 5 years ago too.
Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#205So much about DuckDuckGo's claim that Bing is only a part of their search results.
Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#206Using Kagi now
Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#207Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#208DDG relying on bing for doing searches is... strange to me. I feel like I've seen its own web crawler in my access logs
Yeah, I knew they rely on Bing but didn’t know this much. This really makes me not want to use ddg anymore. I’m seriously considering just paying $108/year to Kagi.
Once I hit 3600 searches & was faced with the prospect of either going back to DuckDuckGo & Google to provide inferior search results -OR- paying $108/year for Kagi, it made the choice pretty simple. But it took me a few months to get to that point, and I don't think I spent more than $15 in that time figuring out if Kagi was right for me.
Re: DuckDuckGo was down
#209So much about DuckDuckGo's claim that Bing is only a part of their search results.
Not defending DDG or anyone here but it depends on the cause of the outage... is it something broken in Azure (for example) that's causing it? As has been pointed out it's still possible to search with Bing (both directly and through DDG with bangs) so it might not be as simple as you're implying.