Kodak's failure to respond to the threat of digital photography has always been a classic example of an innovators dilemma fail... but after reading this I realize it was far worse than I thought. Having been given 30-40 years of financial data on the effect of digital photography squeezing them out of one lucrative sector they wasted all that unique foreknowledge on ignoring digital photography in the consumer space…
When Kodak and Polaroid went to war
41–43 of 43 posts
Re: When Kodak and Polaroid went to war
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Before their downfall, Sears had a better website than Amazon for buying hard goods. When Amazon was still focused on selling books, Sears had a huge array of non-book stuff that could be bought and shipped to their store for free, or delivered anywhere at a fairly low cost. I bought all kinds of stuff that way, at a time when buying anything online still seemed kind of novel. For a very long time the Sears Parts web…
I think the issue with Sears is they had a ton of large brick-mortar-stores (often the "anchors" at malls, which is another nearly dead industry with the last indoor mall built in the US in 2006). Remember the fear of Wal-Mart killing main street in the late 90s into the 2000s? Wal-Mart came in and killed the competition, which included Sears. Then Amazaon annihilated Sears further and took a huge dent in Wal-Mart. S…
Well that's straight up false.
The American Dream mall in East Rutherford, NJ opened in 2019.
Re: When Kodak and Polaroid went to war
#43The OG East Coast vs (Mid)West Coast battle.
Kodak was (is? meh.) in Rochester NY; Polaroid was in Cambridge, MA.
That’s as about as east coast as you can get.