Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is OpenAI a finance company? I guess that would explain a lot.
They pay like one.
Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
201–210 of 567 posts
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
I stopped browsing Reddit. I imagine the people who posted comments to Reddit saying they’re going to leave Reddit aren’t a representative sample.
Same. Redditor for 15 years and the API thing was the last straw. I didn’t post about not engaging with or using the platform anymore. Nor did I delete my account, since it still holds some value to me. But I slinked away into the darkness and now HN is my social media tool.
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#203There’s a recurring pattern here of OpenAI getting caught red handed doing bad things and then being all like “Oh it was just a misunderstanding, nothing more, we’ll get on to fixing that ASAP… nothing to see here…” It’s becoming too much to just be honest oversights.
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#204I'm not following this very closely, but agreements that block employees from selling (private) vested equity are a market term, not something uniquely aggressive OpenAI does. The Vox article calls this "just as important" as the clawback terms, but, obviously, no.
They threatened to block the employee who pushed back on the non-disparagement from participating in tender offers, while allowing other employees to sell their equity (which is what the tender offers are for). This is not a "market term".
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#205If this really was a mistake the easiest way to deal with it would be to release people from their non disparagement agreements that were only signed by leaving employees under the duress of losing their vested equity. It's really easy to make people whole for this, so whether that happens or not is the difference between the apologies being real or just them just backpedaling because employees got upset. Edit: Looks…
For whatever it's worth (not much), Sam Altman did say they would do that > if any former employee who signed one of those old agreements is worried about it, they can contact me and we'll fix that too. very sorry about this. https://x.com/sama/status/1791936857594581428
don't contact OpenAI legal, which leaves an unsavory paper trail
contact me directly, so we can talk privately on the phone and I can give you a little $$$ to shut you up
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#206Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#207If this really was a mistake the easiest way to deal with it would be to release people from their non disparagement agreements that were only signed by leaving employees under the duress of losing their vested equity. It's really easy to make people whole for this, so whether that happens or not is the difference between the apologies being real or just them just backpedaling because employees got upset. Edit: Looks…
LLM cares not whether something is said or whether the action is described. No doubt, openai is as vacuous as their product is effect. GIGO.
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have worked for multiple startups (Malwarebytes, Vicarious, Rad AI, Explosion AI, Aptible, Kenna Security). Not once have I seen an exit agreement that stated they would steal back my vested equity if I didn't sign. This is definitely not "standard restrictions".
Comp clawbacks are quite common in finance, at least contractually. It's rare for it to go ahead, but it happens. It isn't some especially weird thing.
Re: Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Semi off-topic, but the trend of AI influencers adopting the all-lowercase communication style in professional conversation has been very annoying. It makes them appear completely unserious. I recently received an job recruitment email for an AI role in all-lowercase and I was baffled how to interpret it.
I don’t think it’s only AI influencers that do this. I’ve noticed people use lowercase as some sort of power move. Like they’re so busy and important they don’t care about conventions.