CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
1–10 of 138 posts
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#2And a follow-up: https://whatheco.de/2013/02/16/camelcase-vs-underscores-revi...
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#3hyphen-case is worth the grammar concessions (like making whitespace between binary operators mandatory).
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#4Underscore is a double-pinky keystroke.
As someone who has battled RSI, I stopped using snake case and underscore-prefixed member variables because of the added stress all those underscores place on the weakest fingers.
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#5hyphen-case is worth the grammar concessions (like making whitespace between binary operators mandatory).
sPoNgEbOb-CaSe combined with hyphens is the only viable solution
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#6If I read figure 2 correctly (in the follow up study), the difference in find time only appears in 3-word names, while for 2-word names the time is the same
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#7Ok, so I’m most definitely going to snakeCase my Hungarian notation from now on.
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#8now a study on tabs vs spaces, please
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#9I find snake case so much easier to read, breathing space between words is there for a reason.
Re: CamelCase vs underscores: Scientific showdown (2011)
#10hyphen-case is worth the grammar concessions (like making whitespace between binary operators mandatory).
kebab-case and SCREAMING-KEBAB-CASE are often found in urls too